YESTERDAY PEOPLE

Yesterday People.

I would like to draw the attention of anyone reading the content on this page to certain set of people whom were a social worm. A core social dilema to anyone they meet. They are a breeding pest, the type that gloat on people life.
I call them 'Yesterday People'. They were yesterday because they will know everything they need to know about you and your life on the day they meet with you. On that spot of the day they draw up their conclusion. They stay with you on that day on the fact they could draw up on you. It is then up to you if you want to live another day and do a new thing. what they know about you today is what they will carry for the rest of the life you are to know them and associate with them.

What it boils down to is that they do not believe in changes. Changing is a burging, damn too problematic for them to comprehend. If you were to scrutinize them to the core they were barn to shoot out in your face and ask; Why all the sudden changes?

They gain a whole load of awareness on you be it wrong or right is not their problem. it is what they know, what they can see or read about you. They do this like a computer program, then stick it up in their brain. They will tried as possible to remain very shallow; which we call on the 'Level. On the shallow edge is where the best view is. I recon that the depth of life and deeds is only for the deep individuals. They are good at their judgement the way they see it but they are poor at judgeing what is happening in the process. What they call that which is in process is 'A Waste of Time and Effort'.

Come tomorrow they are not expecting anything new from you. come rain, come sunshine they are not expecting anything new from you. If you should, just suppose you do change they will conjure a rationality which will put you back in that box they have made for you. It suite them that way than to admit and accept.

True most of us believe in changes but a load of us do not like it. And their are some whom will not accept it be it in them or in any person they have come in contact with. In my view these lots were reletionship baddies. what they wrought in havoc is more than the few courtesy they will pay to you if you do good.
I am not an expert in relationship; or had any degree in psychology to deal with hard nuts like these. but for the sake of humanity, some people believe in changes and the few that does not, well turf luck, my guess is that we should all live by what we believe. In what you believe is in is where your salvation lies.


Most of us has the capacity to follow up on detail on a day to day basis even to a year. And some for a lifetime. It is a free thinking world however having said that some religion and organisation do not permit free thinking. Where it is permitted a person is free to think whatever pleases the heart. Your thought do not do any work,act,convince, or win over anything. It is your actions, what we call deeds and the word you speak and was heard. You can't move the world around with the thought in your mind. Well, not mine world.

Changes affect concepts, changes affect thoughts, changes affect plans. It disturb the emotion and perturb the mind. It is true, we know these but that is just what makes the big difference in a little world. The problem is what to do with these bunch of humans whom are very short sighted and fails to allow more than enough room for changes which could disturb their mode of life. For real, they have a very short memory capacity; something like zero point five bit of memory. And look at the world, the huge mega billion stuff to know; where did you want them to stack it all up in? Some things and some people needs to be fixed.

I would have suggest that we teach them the core aspects of changes but that is wrong. It will be going against their own believe and concept. And to teach them to make room for changes in their conception will be too bloody much of asking as there is only a few bit of memory in their. They need it for the things which matter most to them, the things they need, not changes I am afriad.

I have been in the company of few Nigerian(Yoruba) people and I could say they are very loyal to what is important to their lovelihood. What thier mind need is the little belive they could live bye. No, changes is a far cry from their mind. 'As it is from the begining so shall it be forever' I must have heard some of them say in their mind. 'What will be has been known and what has been has been before' is a true gospel that they pronounce flabbergestically.

These Yoruba people had even come to the belive that their thought alone will do all the work for them. They believe that thinking will get them far beyond the reach of their mind. which is true. But that it will get everything done in it own good time is conjured falacy. Thinking will not draw water from a well. It will not put concrete on a rough road to make it paved. These were just the few people I had move with which I could draw from their mind. My guess is that there are others out there with such concept.

A popular American writer has said; 'Do not correct the feeble minded or you will corrupt them.' It is not an excert quote but close. ..........

The Devil Family Tree(Unedited)

IN THE BEGINNING.

One tedious doctrine which presently, above every existing doctrines of the scripture prove hard to tackle or analyse in anyway yet permitted is the doctrine of the blood . categorically, and significantly the blood of Jesus Christ; the path of the flow of the blood. Every blood do flow and perform the same task, however some has the power the others do not possess. Many may not see it likewise, because every doctrine and knowledge on the blood has been dealt with and analysed. If I agree with this as some may do I will be in the same tumble boat as most people were in the whole wide range of the Christendom. Sticking to the widely accepted and recognised doctrines which does have the principles of the doctrines of Balaam and the Nicoleatians within. Rev.2.

In this age of the present day Christendom, many were still locked in the bondage of sacrificial atonement of sin.
Truly, the presence of sin remove a lot of things from our spiritual lives and also the physical life is greatly affected most often times. But we are more at present focused on the spiritual than the physical because out of it now comes the physical: ‘the things seen were made by the things not seen’.
The presence of sin in the body remove the protection of God while in the spirit it remove from the presence of God. The thin line between the flesh and the spirit were drawn very close when it comes to the issue of sin and punishment of sin.
When tracing sin, we have been locked into the garden of Eden. Which is a true knowledge and of course the first sin against God and from man is disobedient but against man and woman it is wickedness, and against animal and man; the Serpent and Man is rebellion; usurp of authority. Differ from the first Coup de et, which took place from the heavens to the Earth. Anyway that is rebellion, completely different from the way the serpent did his own against Man. Although it a sought of rebellion against authority however, it was carried out strategically and deviously.
Completely different from disobedience and wickedness, which was masterminded by the Serpent himself, then after that we witnessed the judgement of God. But his mercy precede his judgement. He has great affection for the man and the woman therefore it grieved him to destroy the man and the woman: He couldn't’t afford to kill them immediately; he recognise their shortfall, their ignorance, therefore instead of instant death as promised he repent himself of this evil. And instead banish them away; cast them out of the his presence; away from the the garden in Eden, the paradise, profound Earthly paradise.
Even though he was merciful, which we witness in judgement and him confirming many times in different places through-out the scripture, yet they were without punishment.

The punishment is the lost of Eden. What about the curses? Some might be liable to ask. Anyway, it goes like this: Eden was a pleasure land; peaceful habitation, and tem being in their ignorance state; blinded state, they enjoyed the liberty of innocence for a while. Not knowing the different between good and evil; therefore they could not be charged with any sin. They were totally unprovoked, unperturbed with whatever came along them or they trampled upon or otherwise did as long as it is not the eating of the forbidden fruit. In other words; as long as they know it not as either good or evil;. ‘ in the time of unknown the Lord overlook”. Without knowledge of sin; there is obviously no commuter of an offence.
Who saw this ? who gained light of this understanding ?

Who notice the liberty; free act of the man and the woman and still withheld from just one thing from the entire land. The serpent of- course notice this; he has watched them deligently quite often times. He marveled on their innocence, ignorance and their caution and evasion from one tree in the midst of the garden; just this single tree out of the whole garden, they withdraw from. He was very aware of their entire movement. What did he do? He took of the fruit of the tree they evade and eat it himself; suppose it should have the same reaction. Undoubted it did have the same reaction. He went to the woman, he ask the woman of the reason behind their evading the fruit; but to ask a direct question will and might result in receiving no reply to non.. So he got cunning. The serpent is a gentle, watchful animal. He watched silently for all things all knowledge. What gift did the serpent has? I perceived it has a mind different to all other beast of the field; its thinking and sight,and deligent approach to things was a privilege.It saw the new creation, knows that all things were new which obviously only the man too knows. But the man was ignorance of one thing which the Serpent must have thought it has an advantage over.


Although it does sound more like heresy than the truth of the gospel and of the doctrine of God. God never tempt anyone, he is never tempted and he does not tempt by what is evil. A sure sound knowledge and reference than what has previously been said that there is a possibility that God himself might have put the man to test to know if he will obey his commandment or not. This kind of doctrine is far from sound knowledge; it stinks of foolishness and deceit than wisdom.
Another theory which might seems very convincing to adhere to was that the Serpent, during his watching, and thoughtful admiration of the garden and the man; he might have gone to inquire of God why the humans were not eating of the fruit in the midst of the garden. This is believable, because it did it again in the event of Job. I strictly stress that you should not lay much emphasis on this because some and certainly a broadly known issue was the knowledge that the Serpent was one of the fallen angels. And many theological studies has not in anyway taught different nor differentiate him apart and classified him as a mere beast of the field who craftily sought his own way to un-usurp the authority of man over it.
Anyone with spiritual discernment or sound mindedness should have at one time or often encounter the Serpent with woman than the man. He delighted more in the woman than the man. To bring the man down was its target from the garden. it uses the woman. Why?

The woman was good to look at, and of a different nature entirely from the beast and the man. Through the woman and by the woman, the Serpent create, author all sort of sins. Why it was fond of the woman is left for the asking? I myself will like to know.
Another mystery of Eden, a phenomenon, is the presence of evil in the garden. how shall we account for this? It sound totally out of content, out of good knowledge but it is a knowledge because it has been made available.
How will they have known of evil; obtain the knowledge of evil; of good and evil if there has been not the existence of such evil. How possible could they have seen or known evil if it was not there to be seen or acknowledged.?
This worth its asking because the tree was the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. A rational method of observing this enigma, a good perception is to suggest that, there has to be the presence of evil within the garden for them to gain knowledge of even after eating the fruit and there eyes were opened.
Now of the curses; I felt very comfortable with the idea and knowledge that there wasn’t any curses upon the man from the garden. The man was not cursed, not that he did not sin but that he was not cursed.

The man was not cursed in the garden of Eden but the ground was the one that the Lord cursed. Neither in anyway was the woman too cursed but the Serpent was the one that the Lord cursed. Basically, what he did was like a foretelling of what they were to encounter outside Eden. What there portion will be after he drove them away from the garden. isn’t it good that there only punishment was the casting away from the garden. That was the only punishment that was giving and it resulted in all other things which took place..

Let’s observe this again logically; there stood Eden, all well planted, tendered, grooved and watered to bring forth its fruits in its season. All different kinds of fruits of the vine were planted in it, with animal and others.further in there was the tree of life and that of the knowledge of good and evil. The tree of life they eat as often as they like until sin was found in them and it was taken away from them lest they possess everlasting life while in sin.
Why will not the man eat through painful toil when there is no more provision of abundant fruit that produce in their season. How can the ground cursed produced as when it was not cursed. Thank goodness it is still liable to produce for Adam, there was a Man that the ground was also cursed and forbidden to produce any product to him. Or the woman; why will she not bring forth her offspring in pain? She has known of good and of evil; and she live on her husband who toil in pain like non cares before they can eat bread. This conditions were worth serious consideration because it was not until Noah was born that Man has hope of the ground being restore back to them.----.

The pain of toil also result in pain of birth; or who else should she look unto for affection, who should her affection be unto? If not whom she was the flesh and bone of . who put bread on her table.
Moreover tell the story of the lost paradise at dinner table to your children and see if they won't rage of revenge when they see the serpent crawling by. Even the story of how the Serpent deceived them into disobedience to God is enough to course rage for revenge. Isn’t the children the arrow in the hand of the mighty?.
It has been cursed and made to eat the dust of the ground, don’t ea fruit of the tree anymore, no more knowledge for you mister big scheme. Gen.3:1-24.
So when I said that man was not cursed in the garden, I hope you understand what I am talking about?. And what is more, left that he did not for them? He made them garment of skin.


Life outside the garden :

What happened after the garden? outside paradise, it is a easily perceived situation; looking through the words that the Lord has uttered to them before he cast them out of his presence; his pleasure. Where did the Serpent went after? What happened to the surface of the earth; the ground that was cursed ? and of the man and his wife, they went from pleasure to suffering. The ground been cursed is a great issue, in my mind; at the ushering of the curse; I can see a mighty wind, with storm and thunder, swept over the face of the earth and wipe away every thing from it.

Is it an insignificant issue that the man after living Eden still find it hard to obey the word of the Lord and go against another of his word. The man was to eat of the plant of the field; ‘and you will eat the plants of the field’3vs18.
But what happened ? After much toil and the land still refuse to yield in abundance for food, the man took of the beast of the field and eat. So it was out of the pain of toil and sweat that man resulted in eating animal as supplement to the plant which is often late or small in coming compared to the amount of toil put into it.
On leaving the garden; the man and his wife left not through the east gate; I suppose in one way or the other, scriptural truth, backed up by every theological doctrines is the circumstances that warrant their abstinent from the east gate. Knowing this we were left discern the path which they lead out of Eden.
From knowing where they led out of the garden we could from there established there habitation outside the garden; in Eden. But of one concrete fact was that Cain return back to live in the east of Eden, close to the garden. where they have been previously driven away.
4:16 :- ‘So Cain went out from the Lord’s presence and lived in the land of Nod, East of Eden.”
Cain moved to the east of the garden afterward: which established that prior to then non dwell within the perimeter of the Tree of Life [East of Eden].
Circumstantially, without any objection hopefully, we were left with three open sides which they could have dwelt; three opened gate laid bare which they could have used to flee out of the garden.

Initiative and logic reasoning tells us that they will flee towards the exist (west). However, being under the influence of a terrible storm, terrified to the extreme, with freight unmeasured nor experienced on earth again ever since, until the day of vengeance of the Lord. Being under this type of influence they were not left with choice of direction or orientation of their destination; there where about, however, instinctively, they were likely to be prompted to take the next available left or right turn, depending on what and what is in their path like in the east side where they could not pass because of the Flaming Sword and the Cherubim.
The garden situated in the east of Eden [Earth] is no more available to them and they were to keep away from the garden. But curiously prevails most often above instruction or intelligence, which therefore, has been invoked as of the reason why Cain moved closer to the garden; East of Eden. [East of the Earth].
We could not just conclude nor as a result suggest that he journeyed to the garden very often and consequently, into the midst of the garden where there lay the tree of life.


And hopefully it still there till date.
But the ground being cursed again because of him; and denied the fruit of the ground of any kind; where else will he find food to eat and feed his family. So the garden of God was the only available he could be in reach of and will not have to toil the ground. Even when he did, it will not yield.
In Cain was another revelation of sin; two more evil revealed; this were very apparent; Hatred and Murder. However the scripture made us to know of anger which predominately resulted in hatred then manslaughter / killing-
Our count of sin henceforth reach three. Why do he has to rise against his brother in the field and kill him in cold blood? His brother did what was good and saw the reward of it; instead to my simple mind or what has been termed before as repentant heart; he could have just plead with the Lord and made a new sacrifice. But, he took the life of the chosen; to bring a curse on himself.


The first man to be cursed; and further he was driven away from the ground which opened its mouth to receive his brother’s blood from his hand. Gen. 4: 9-16.
Many should have guess who the Devil was by now talking from the content of the scripture. Except that they know not how to link the signs with the words together. Cain was born of the blood and flesh. And from there on the man Cain live on within what we could say the reach of eternal life. And here forth I reveal to you the person of the Devil; A murderer from the beginning of his life; And here forth I reveal to you the person of the Devil; A murderer from the beginning of his life. He was not of the spirit like unto Adam and Eve. After his act of killing, the Lord put a mark on him(Cain) that any who find him that non should kill him. “The revelation of the mystery behind the mark of the beast”. The book of revelation discuss this in content, he that bearer this mark, or any that bears it not .
I should not be confronted with much question on how I come up with this revelation, because as I speak so it has bypass one principle in the scripture which I suppose is meant to be used to protect this mysteries before its time. Consider this verse 14 “And I will be hidden from your presence; I will be a restless wanderer on the Earth” So the Lord delivered him from death by other hands because of the mark on him. ‘you will be a restless wanderer on the Earth’ said the Lord. Non will attempt to kill him when found; any that does will suffer vengeance seven times over’. Vs.15.

Here is a man in all genealogy who has no death date and his chronological genealogy was shortened in the scripture. It ended with his great grand son whom took after the sin of his fathers. He was visited with the transgression of his fathers and forth and forth he did more. Lamech came from the root of Cain and the blood of Cain flow within him; it was within him. He was under the same master, and yielded to the same will as Cain. Gen. 4: 23. It was’t detailed how his offence was done however the root of Cain seems to be pulled out of the will and eyes of God from then onward. The author of the scripture, and them that compiled it notice this disannulment of this root from anything good in history since from their hoary days. Who dare kill him or Lamech to face the seven fold vengeance or the seventy-seven fold of Lamech.


Curses Administered :
From the garden of Eden [Earth], the curses issued out were :
Adam – He received no curses whatsoever; but suffer from not being in the garden. he has work and sweat hard to eat.
Eve – Same as Adam; but her own in childbirth; she has gone from the source of life.
Serpent – There is no any other animal cursed as to the Serpent; and if there should be, then the record shows that the serpent is the first of all animal to be cursed. And also the first of all creature to be cursed. His curse came before that of Cain.
It was cursed to become a crawling creature. Emphatically, it was stated; ‘curse3d are you above all the live stocks and all the wild animal. You will crawl on your belly and will eat dust all the days of your life”. No more nourishing food for you mister.

And the second curse went to the ground, a phenomenal; it sinned not; does it live that it should bear the curse of the sinner? Yet it was cursed because of the man.
‘cursed is the ground because of you’-
it will produce thorns and thistles for you’ vs.18.
The ground was cursed because of the man; not the man in anyway was cursed, neither the woman.

Cain – the first of all man to be cursed; not of all creature because one creature is already cursed. That is the Serpent, among every animals in the house and in the wild the serpent is cursed.
Likewise; Cain was cursed among everyman that ever lived. It read that; “now you are cursed from the ground which opened its mouth to receive your brothers blood from your hand". Not the ground only was cursed but the man also. And he receive no mercy whatsoever. Of this curse is even the reality that he will not eat anything from the ground again because the ground will not yield its crop to him. Vs.12. So how would Cain be eating ?.

Again he was meant to be removed from the face of the earth because he should not tread on it again. However it was’t made known in historical documentation if he was or not. probably the earth must have swallowed him or the angels carried him away.

Lamech was’t cursed by God; if he was, it was’t recorded. But with his sin, there is the likely hood of an automatic administration of curse upon him.
Two were cursed; the Serpent and the Man Cain!!!.
Was the generatrion if Cain erased or were they reserved ?
Lamech was their last branch; A lost Root.!
Another branch springing up from Seth; the brother of Cain, which was similar to that of Cain because Lamech surface, living up to 777 years before he died.






CAIN TREE : Adam (930yrs)


Cain, Seth (912YRS)

ENOCH, ENOSH (905YRS)

IRAD, KENAN (910YRS)

MEHUJEAL, MAHALALEL (895YRS)

METHUSHAEL, JARED (962YRS.)

LAMECH, ENOCH (365YRS. BE-
FORE ADOPTION.)


METHUSELAH (969YRS.)

ADAH, ZILLAH

LAMECH (777YRS.)

JABAL , JUBAL, TUBAL, CAIN , NAAMAH.

NOAH (500YRS. BEFORE THE FLOOD,-
950YRS. AFTER THE FLOOD.)


_________________________________

SHEM, HAM, JAPHETH.



END,……………







CAIN :- This man is of inanimous, unpredictable decission, premeditated actively. First among all man to shed a man’s blood. He is a man with a birth day bit never a death date. He builded a city, which is more likely situated at where he went to dwell. Very close bye. After the birth of his first son. The land of Nod: East of Eden. [east of the earth]. It is an amazing issue that he should chose east of Eden, a place at close proximity to the garden of eden, and also, the tree of life; which is still within the garden and as a result, the Lord is more to be visiting there often.

Lamech got himself two woman/ wife; sin of adultery of fornication was the master behind this; or a way of getting away from this sin. His daughter was the first ever named in the bible. NAAMAH.
A devine revelation, more like the scientific analyses of genetic heredictory traits in human. So in the seed of evil sown into the root of Cain, The seed of Sin, the evil that has permiate this root, grow from tree to tree and from branch to branch. It isn’t circumstential that Lamech married two wives then proceed to kill a man for his wound and after seeking refuge under the act of segregation of Cain.
“ If cain is avenged Seven times,
then Lamech Seventy-Seven times” vs.24.
lamech is under what we could call a genealogy curse or trait. The Lord must have come to this conclusion; that their blood has been polluted with this evil that reside in Cain and from then onward passed down to his off-spring. And the most prominent or less privilleged will welcome what has become the oracle or mark of their ancestor.

So, this oracle or mark reside in Lamech therefore he did the work of his father. ‘ if you were of God you will do the will of God; But you were of your father the devil; and his will you will do; For he was a murderer from the beginning”.
Acceptably, this verse clinch the genealogical trait and oracle. The ancestor god.
Let’s try to permiate through this shadow with some light of understanding. The slight elucidation of the knowledge that has been shown unto us in this scriptural historical event. Now more of spiritual than the physical.
In etiology, logical reasoning will allow a spiritual reasoning on this account. The spiritual perspective; signs and words to reveal knowledge, I should say is permissable. Signs were there for them that believe; I think I should elucidate our understanding of the ministration and administration of signs. However, this path of reasoning, the etiological path will not permit. There are reasonable signs and occurrence with their distinguished mark laid down from the beginning. These proceeding from within the creations in the garden and then proceed forth unto their off-spring.


When the cloud is dark and cloudy most will conclude that it shall rain. Just like the color of the leaves of the tree, they often tell the period of the year. When it is green, the vegetation is quite good, but when it turns yellow, dry up and fall to the ground we could tell which period of the year it is. Simple signs: even in spiritual perception. So also is the act of Cain and his genealogical trait.
We talking about curses, I specifically, segregate the cursed from the un-cursed. And their curses were known.
The first human to be cursed was Cain and the first animal, livestock or wild animal or beast to be cursed was the Serpent. Like what they often said ‘bird of the ssame feather flow together’. This deserve a phenomenal outlook.
The serpent and the man called Cain could not have been walking together in whatever way advisable, even while cursed they don’t seems the best of friend . why?
The word of the Lord “And I will put enemity between you and the woman, and between your off-spring and hers,m he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel’.vs15.


However, what else could happen to a man whom is expected not to be in the presence of the Lord, a restless wanderer. And the Serpent whom has been humbled to crawling and eating dust. How quick do you think that Cain will yield to the reasoning given by the Serpent to kill his brother in cold blooded. I should think it is a wrong idea to suggest that serpent might have talked Cain into doing what he did. Did he not do it with Eve?
There is a basic idealogical fact to suggest that he, the Serpent have poisoned the heart of Cain against Abel just like he did with Eve and the Apple, then onward to Adam.


Why should the Serpent tested the capacity of the human again against his own. The wiseness, knowledge of the human that has been appointed ruler over him. He did it to Adamthrough Eve why not their off-spring.?
There is a course and an occasion and also a means but however, the ultimate goal could not be specifically identified. Because reasoning and logic with ensamples of doctrines and occurrence made us to be aware that; if there should arise a temptation or a test, there is the likehood of a worthy price to be gained from it . The tempter is after something and the temteds has to protect and prevent this. However, a wall exist within Cain’s life, An edge was made; and if broken the Serpent will definitely bite.

Consider this and compare it with the event in the garden :
To Cain :- “then the Lord said to Cain ‘why are you angry? Why is your face down casted? If you did right will you not be accepted? But if you do not do what is right, sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must master it” 6&7.

To Adam:- “And the Lord commanded the man “you are free to eat from any tree in the garden; but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat it you will surely die.” 16 & 17.
What was common between the two of them was a command however Adam’s own carried a concequency while Cain might be regerded as a warning.
And what did the Serpent first issue out in his first eon:
If not sin then what else could it be ?.

What did he said to the woman? Gen.3vs. 1 –
To carp it all he said: ‘you will not surely die’ like he knows all.
And in the event of Cain’s life, the Lord tells him that sin is crouchinh at his door and him is it desire to have but he has to master it and rule over it.
Who is sin if not the author of sin; the Serpent.
In my mind, I could imagine the Serpent saying; master who or what? Come Cain, you can not master it, you just have to do as you please, you are a god yourself, you know what is good from what is evil and you can do whatever you desire.
We could easily considered asking ; was it the big Serpent itself or its off-spring. But that isn’t actually a consuderable issue? In the translation of the bible that verse reads; ‘sin lieth at your door; And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shall rule over him”. Noting distintive, the person value, his and him. Sin is a creature,living.
The Serpent will have leapt up at the mention of sin with Cain and the advice to rule over him/it . that rule is mine, it might have ssaid to himself / itself. How amiable !.


There is no way we could establish how the serpent came up with such deceitful act. Out of all animal of the wild and livestock. The bible made as to know that, the serpent was a very crafty animal than any of the wild animals the Lord God had made. The bible specifically, called the Serpent an animal because it was an animal. Formallywith four limbs until it became sin and cursed; Anything cursed is sin, so the Serpent became a crawling animal.
The rebellion against man stated within the Serpent; he intended to un-surp the dominion of man, and if I should say he successfully un-surp the power and dominion through his craftiness.

Then henceforth, I suppose the phraseologist of recent generation that phrased that ‘it is an animal world’ must be speaking from words of wisdom; talking of the mystery of God, hidden from the foundation of the world.
Adam fell to it in the garden and Cain also did in the field; when he rose and kill his brother. It has become an undefited, unwitted counterpart. It was quite apparent that cains act was a premeditated act. Gen.4:8. The mind of the Devil is and was revealed. Half human, half animal; because it has been ministered to by the Serpent. And him premeditating his act revealed the act of the Serpent; the animalism. The Serpent will premeditate his action gigarly, and approach cautiously to his prey. Such was the action of Cain. And after he did the act; commited the offence, see how he replied to the Lord. “Am I my brothers keeper” . knowing what he has done, what has happened to his brother from his hand, he ternished and belittle the knowledge of God or can,t you see the lier from the beginning at his act ? I believe non of you have ever consider this “ I don’t know” vs.9.
The Lord asked Cain, “where is thy brother”? . and knowing what he has done he replied likewise; “I don’t know”.


Now that is another sin in emacipation; the sin of lie.
This the Serpent must have done from his craftiness, from it comes lies and deceit. See who killed his own brother in cold blood and still denied it to God.
I don’t see the reason why Lamech sought refuge: I hope he judge himself likewise, as he sought refuge from the avenger of Blood.
Animal world or no animal world, has got nothing to do with this generation. Because Christ has rising and raised higher into the heaven. The son of man, the possition where Adam or Eve could have taken, and consequently Cain resume but the Serpent overthrew them, the lamb of God: Christ resume that possition; and the prophecy came true which said ; "and he shall be called the mighty God, the everlasting father” Isa.9:6.


Futhermore, if Christ was raised higher above the heavens where is Adam? Where is Eve? And moreover, where is Cain?
Now I shall show you a revelation, uncover a mystery: whomsoever believe as it is writing shall not be confounded.
Adam was born of the Spirit, so was Eve. But Cain was born of the flesh and blood . –
Christ was orn of the spirit but he was made flesh and blood; he became flesh and blood ; the son of man, he is flesh and blood even after his ressurection from death, and he lives for ever by the ordination of God.
Earlier, I revealed how Cain moves closer to the garden and subsequently to the Tree of life. Indefinately.
Also. What preceed thereafter to the great flood? The seed of the serpent that grew among man.
Although the scripture might have stop the chrology of Cain but his genealogy do proceed, only that they were not useful in the plan of the Lord.
How do we know this ? A very factual event is the flood. The scripture said ‘the Lord was grieved because he has made man. why?
Because that every inclination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil all the time”. Gen.6:5
Animal kingdom, not man kingdom again………………


Look at the Earth, look at the animal kingdom, who was in rule and still is in rule?…-
I have asked once of the occurrence in the wilderness, when the children of Isreal were told to look at the brozen Serpent the Lord told Moses to make and whomsoever look at the Serpent shall be saved from death of the bite of the venomous snake sent among them. You don’t suppose that the Lord will reasonably and amicably turn them into idol worshiper of his own accord ? look at the commandment; it has been with the Lord even before it was given out to them to live by.
There was a sign revealed there for them to consider, but they could not see and they could not know. One thing was revealed first to the Lord, or I should say the Lord was trying to let them see. There as a result the occurrence of the snake. The people did not know God nor the words of the Lord. They knows no doctrine but their own need and feeding. Because if they do they should have crushed its head down under their feet immidiately it showed up among them instead of them turning its image to their saviour. If they had done so the Lord will have been pleased. ‘my people were being destroyed because they lack knowledge’. SHAME.
However, they did not such a thing, therefore the Lord knows and sudsequently tried to signify to them. But to whom ? A blind People.
The lord knowing of the rule of the Serpent, holding a higher heaven than man; from there, I could if allowed that the Lord conceive of the plan of the Meshia. The birth of Christ. The prophecy went forth from there henceforth. It start from nowhere else but from the wilderness. Moses and even Balaam.
To reveal the possition of the Serpent to the man, if it works then it is true; was the idea and reason for the brozen snake put on a pole. And what happened ? it did work, the serpent, the snake was higher, because they look at his image and they were saved. And lived. Num. 21 : 4-9.


So the gospel said; if you will lift Jesus up he will draw all man unto himself.

What brought leviathan into the wilderness that he revealed his pride and the Lord has to crush his head down . Ps. 74: 14, Is.27 :1.
The psalmist sang that it was made food fopr them; however the Lord confirm it to Job that it is in the sea, even Isaiah relate to it. Job 41 : 1-4 &24, 25&34. It did boasted to the Lord there and it was crushed on the head. But of eating, feeding on it flesh sound more like a myth than truth.

An occurrence happened recently about a year or two ago (year 2000). While I was in the spirit, there arouse a war in the spirit; within my perimeter or it exceed is not fore me to consider. But what seems like a war occurred and the spirit of man were raised against the spirit of animals that dominate the heavens above them. They cast them down top thew ground and from their different heavens .

Solomon said; in Ecclesiates 3 : 21. ‘who knoweth the spirit of man that goeth upward and the spirit of beast that goeth downward to te earth.?

This is wisdom and a distinguished factor between a beast and a man. This restled against what was said earlier in verses 19-20. That speaks of the flesh while verse 21 speaks of a man. The flesh has no rejoicing in this except now that Christ rose from the dead and promise likewise unto all flesh. So therefore the flesh has hope of eternity and could be counted more above the beast.

Our mind has been centered upon what happened in the garden, the sin that man did as the result, that permit the coming of Christ.
How did he loose his heaven, with the serpent that deceives him; ?
Christ said :- “Behold I have seen the devil fall from heaven like a thunder, behold I have given you authority to tremple on the serpent and Scorpions and every powers of the enemy. Lk.
Rom. 16 :20 – ‘and the God of peace shall bruise satan under your feet shortly’.

This distinguish the mission of Christ and we realised this not instead we were looking at the atonement the sacrificial lamb, the washing of the body with the blood.
And further, some religious fanatics will be pleading the blood and sprinkling the blood. Just like Aaron did upon the alter and the horns.
If all was only of the atonement and removal of sacrifice of sin then little is done and if our salvation was because he died and rose from the grave only and not that he has overcome the Serpent and the devil, then we still under the same bond master and you will still have to look up to the serpent or the bronze snake on the pole to get saved. However, he overcome the devil , the Serpent and receive the power he held over man back unto himself. Because he was the son of man and he did overcame the serpent. The one that sit and not to die no more, holding the power over death too was overthrow; and he overcame death.


Is this the work of the cross and of the sacrificial blood shed upon the cross. The act of atonement, that Christ took upon himself.
The path of the blood; of calvary started from the wilderness, the prophecy went forth and generation to generation await this mashia to deliver them from their sin.
Now we know where the sin came from, who was the sin.
How a little match can consume a whole house even a whole city; this speaking of the Serpent and their pollution to the human race.
The seed that first entered into Eve then proceed onward. Why the lust against man ? why the ur-surp of the authority laid down.
If satan has lost his heaven and it is casted down to the ground; then what war fare do we fight but the product of our heart.
The path the blood of Christ took and the cross is left for the understanding to lighten upon. Sacrifice and sprinkling of blood has been done away with. False religion issueing out of fear and the intigation of the Serpent. And the earthly father norturing you all is quite an astornishment; he too do provide for his own ‘If you that be evil can give good thing how much more our father in heaven”.














The path
of the
Blood






By
Femmy martin.