Monday 18 June 2007

Spiritism

Definition of Spiritism

Spiritism is what I call certain actions which has its places only in the psychic mode. When a person is solely dependant on the spirit and not on practical action of things, to provide for the means to life. A spirit dependant is entirely, utterly, and completely spiritual in every aspect of the day to day dealings. This mode of mentality is obtained from a too strong to obscene dependence on god.


It occurred to me that the Spirit are what should not have been but were chanced to be. The world is probably founded on many of such chance occurrences. They are chanced to be at the time of imperfection and from thence they become part of an existence. Wrongly they have been accounted a position undeserved through poor judgement. But as the creation is moving toward perfection I tends to be thinking more of the future of the spirit world. Where would they end up eventually... I tends to believe that there is an eternity for the spirit, a world beyond death that both the living spirit and the spirit of the dead live.

Knowing this I am moved to say that:

I am that which is and everything that is around me is what I and I only say it is.
Whatever is, is what I say is and nothing else is without me to say it is.

My judgement is solely mine and it is only affected by my own reasoning.
It causes thing around me to be what they are. What they were is how I see them and they could be nothing different except I per chance see them different.

Thus, every things of importance acclaimed to the spirit was due to such chanced creation of the judgement of which they were brought by…..

The spirit emerging from the mental conception of any being will still be attached to it for as long as possible – for the duration of the life .



Birth of the spirit
The were born of the word and energy. The universal logo inhabit every spoken/Thought word with a mind of its' own distinction however the universal force is without a mind and ever present and pervading. In short, it is omni-present within and without. These force which is energy in many of its forms either potential or kinetic. Now from this energy a lot of use is applied to it depending on where it is found or re-located. we could move energy round our body and at the same time pin-point to certain part of our body which contain energy and the amount of energy it has. The energy which moves around our body is the same energy which exist within the universe around us. For example, You breath in oxygen and exhale carbondioxide back into the atmosphere. in the atmosphere, there is the presence of both oxygen and carbondioxide, but you take in the whole lot of the air in the atmosphere in little content but more of oxygen. These were present in the body as well in the atmosphere around you. in one way or the next the body and the mind is connected to the universe around you and this is the universal force and your mind is a part of the universal mind.

Spirit were a form created out of these universal force of fusion and fission. Thier entity is contain in the universe and at the same in the body and mind. It happen that the same is within animal and plant. The form and shape is giving from the type of universal mind the force is use by or in control by. The present spiritual world of this age has evolve to so great an advance stage that you could just feel the potential of them evolving into a whole new different world of their own. However, while some were still finding it hard to detached themselve from the affairs of man and earthly deeds of their person; they still lean heavily on man and the earthly essence.

Sometimes during my thought and thinking of these things I sence another probability of the spiritual beings able to emerge out of the dome of the spirit and unreality/non-physical into the dome reality and physical. But, I realise doing this would placed them back in many years of civilisation. Something like the Hunter/Gatherer or a wanderer without name, Identity, or abode, origination, and with a weird language or the normal language.

I was not definite about this occurence but my gut feeling was swinging here and there and I had a close to trance event twice about spirit bodies coming out to be human. Many books had described the growth of the spirit man from minute thought/ word /speach to what is class as god. The essence of the spirit race after being god. However, not one book has describe their destination and organisation as a body of living entity branching out from man.

Speech/Language
Thought/Action
Eating/Drinking/sleep
Marriage/festives

Purposefuness and determined action might be taken over predertamined action and purpose which had been programmed into them by the thought of man.
While they had develop in these aspects yet I am still to notice any development in;

Organs and Growth-
Influences on environment or their own influences on their environment.

The envoronment they live in seems to be a changing world, consequently displaced and changing form and shapes. they appears not to have any or little say so in what environment they were or come upon them. Their ground is a sinking ground, linking one dimension of reality to unreality and unreality to reality.





think, or say a thing beyond or beneath these,
probabbly doting on right and wrong the person would be acting deficiently to the order of things in the schemes of time.
Somehow all that is, needed, necessary and want were under the laws of right and wrong
and as plato as said; socrates claim that is only A good man that can chose to do both as necessary towards a good aim.

The seriousness of this concept is still being quarried...
what happens in terms of murder?
People has diferent logic to the idea of killing and what rated most is they rather not do it.
People tends to hate the idea in general as a good moral attitude of a good man.
Even mercy killing.... but what if it is done in self defence?
To this......... there is variences.
But what does the law says to killing in self defence?
You could still be charged with manslaughter except in situation-
when you could not have aviod it.






These is from a discussion from the saint: Talking of Nirankar as the universal force(energy) or Emptiness.

Dearest Saints, Dhan Nirankar Ji.

Dasi was recently discussing a point with another saint and we couldn't come to a conclusion. We were trying to answer does Nirankar move? I believe that Nirankar does not move while the other saint was saying that He does. For example if you have an empty glass, you see there is Nirankar inside, now if you put water in the glass, Nirankar is replaced by the water and 'comes out' of the glass, therefore moving. This thought follows that of Physics and energy, energy is neither created nor destroyed. My thought is that Nirankar is outside and inside of everything. Nirankar is also in the glass, outside the glass, in the water, etc. All the universe is inside of Nirankar and Nirankar inside of it. Therefore when you put the water in the glass you are still inside of Nirankar so you are just filling water but you didn't move Nirankar. Hence we (or matter) is moving around inside of Nirankar (non-matter). If Nirankar were to move wouldn't the whole of creation move with Him? Dasi found this to be a confusing thought and hard to answer this question. It is a hard question because we are trying to connect something that is a phenomeon known only to be present with matter to non-matter. Dasi has always thought God always stands still and is ever prevading and always watching. Dasi would appreciate some thoughts on this matter and blessings from Saints. If Dasi has made any error please forgive.

Love and Charan Dhool, Dasi Brahama


Does these actually define god or the eternal force or universal force?
Emptiness is what? and the escape of empiteness of the movement of it is what?
These conception seems like something out of the theory of Nothing and Zero entity.


Peace!
Femi Martin....

Aetiology of the wise (Unedited)

Part II

Aetiology of the wise :

Theology, philosophy and different aspect of the works of thoughts originate from what we consider as wisdom. These and more others were basic principles which form and shape this our present world from aeon till the present days.
Religion is not a way of life but merely a principle that encamp life; this is far far differ from the concept of the intelligence that this book is observing. Where religion might count some of it's doctrines as evil and generally unsuitable for man to adhere to, the concept of this book does not look at this doctrine as the religious way. Reasoning within any doctrines as this book is concern is applicable to life in whatever situation that might occur. The application of reasone and judgement either from principle, doctrine or any philosophical aspects to obtain a desired outcome does not tolerate nor regard any other phenomenal aspect of it's application either religiously or principle. With no disrespect to any religion or doctrine the basic conception of this stretches the use of all reasoning and philosophy to achieve a basic need.
Which is in line with the philosophical view of Nietzchan when he said “Nothing is true but all thing is accepted”. All things has its purposes and use.
Preservation and advance of any life is avowed to judgement and rational reasone.
Observation with good reasons describe the path we were being directed nowadays as being open minded and plain. No man is allowed the privilege of a secret life but all things were recorded and could be known by any one curious enough to look into them. From annual earning to family life circle, even in some cases social life were things being reveal on daily basis. Who dear keep a secret nowadays might end up blaming himself, that is the obvious truth of this present age. Either it is good or profitable, it is left for the individual judgement and reasone. This I could vouch is a step developed from insincerity to faithfulness, from error to judgement. We might tends to judge right and act right.




Playing the Devil:

Most commonly, the devil is notorious for only a few things, this are; Lies, deceit, theft, and murder. All this are no more a phenomenon but the reality of our day to day lives and of our society. No man is bound by the law of self against any of this act but all man being in fear of the law of judgement flee from this acts. However I will rather prefer the care of the other mankind to deter you away. Whence not for its sake, but the religious concept will say the
‘fear of God’ while some religion will suggest it to do God a favour. Even human thoughts and principles is more conscientious.
Playing the devil is a fact of life and one principle that could work like magic. This one intelligence all would dear not conceive to put into practice so as to obtain a needed life.
Lets leave the trivial parts of the devil, leave the lying, thieving and the killing which every reasonable and ordinary person will consider a good choice.
However playing the devil in this knowledge is far from the killing, or thieving but it is a mind set of the devil we were about to observe and see the practical reality of his judgement.

Generously I observe a “live and let’s live” means of life rather than a “live and let’s die”. Most criminal especially the thieves (armed robbers and bugler) would prefer a situation Where they won’t have to shed any blood but as to the mastermind of the act they were conceived they often cannot go away without fulfilling the full code name. So for them to live they often kill, this is a pity and a waste of life.

The devil did the same act and did kill just because he has to live and be the accepted (best).and the full code name is the full garment of his name which he is ever the mastermind and not the instigator. It is like you couldn’t taste the orange without peeling away the …….

Of course as you might have guess, I do not conceive playing the devil in this viewpoint however, where the total mindscape of the devil is locked in this regard. We have to look at his short coming and what was not in his favour so as to play the devil without becoming the devil.

Devil is a forbidden name and one big ominous name to refer to by most people but the truth is that they have one huge blinding religious and spiritual fear which is the result of their ignorance to the reality of the devil. Theological reasoning designate the devil as a celestial being and one which abide within the human mindscape, spiritual atmosphere of our present earth. Now that is the philosophy of this present earth and the fate of man. They abide within the second layer of the earthly surface, which is the lithosphere.(1)

Now the philosophy speaks in terms of knowledge, the origin, and ways of the devil with man. From the name devil, I could derive an analogy which resembles what most mindset is composed of D- evil or “The Evil”. In more reckoning, this says he is the Evil within man. In a philosophy, more or less a generalise reasoning, there is a devil inside most human if not all mankind; this is believable and don’t yield to deceive because theological analogy or any spiritual conception will not unveil this to you, it prefer to make you feel safe by saying there are angels around or more -God. The truth is, if it isn’t the devil, then it will be a beast. Because the only god that could and does exist on earth is man. And the devil is merely a creation generated from man because of a will of purpose.

I should like to believe it is a reasonable judgement to first get familiarised with this phenomenal phlegmatic phantom of a creature who has lived through many epoch, and has claimed the entire earth, the heritage of man to become his descendant. Man is the devil; a very common phrase, it isn’t a lie but it is not the entire truth, the truth is, actually the devil, this phenomenal phantasm is a name and appellation

A man lived many epoch ago, when the earth was still fresh and glorious and the glory of the (God) creator is still among man. The man lost his manly nature by an act of sin and became half beast and half man. The devil is a creature of two nature, made up of two individual which is; A Beast and A Man.

He wasn’t created like that but was recreated; he became a man of a double nature through an act of circumstantial error. He became half man and half serpent.
The man himself is not around till now but his descendant lives on and they bear witness by their spirit, and has fill the earth; ‘multiply and fill the whole earth’ A lie is that which assume that the devil still exist. He eternalise himself with a perpetual appellation whence no one could admit to the death of the devil. His death was not commemorated but he did live six hundred and sixty-six years before he died.
Like many would have guess; so what difference does it make if the whole mankind is been
Turn into devils; all men were liars. So me and you, each person is breading a devil within, or might have even had a full grown one within.

This is a basic theological aetiology of whom the devil is and where he could be found. A basic history of the devil is enough familiarisation with him.

What started as one long tale has now been shorten into a little parable with a short phrase; ‘To catch the monkey, you will have to do like the monkey does’. That is to say; to beat the devil you will have to master the devil and do like the devil does. He is one kind that does not play fairly, he has got the crookedness of the serpent.

What I gather up is this; there is hardly not much a distance you could ever effectively strut to or waft, before coming into contact with a devil, In human. It is no cause of freight, if you should be running off from people because they are devil then apparently obvious you will be running away from some one close to you and yourself. Knowingly on account of precaution it has been said and further it is said again; ‘ there is a devil inside most of man’ – I think this notion has been said, generally accepted by most and that settled it. But what has not been known I will reveal to you in just a single phrase as the one said above, don’t be bewildered, of –course a revelation of the present time, is a secret; ‘there is a beast in most man’ whatever beast it could be, either of rodents, or reptile like; snake, lizard, crocodile, insects and pest, or amphibians, such as Frog or Toad, birds even dogs and cats, there seems not to be an ending to what any man could be formed from and shaped into. These are one heck of different breeds of devils and of course it is the destruction of the soul from Devastation of the man that effectuate this belittledness.

Don’t confuse whom and what the devil is, it’s a most terrible mistake. The first error that man made which resulted from divers mismenour, was to constitute different form, origin, shape and nature for the devil, was a bit lacking in knowledge.

It stands very unprofitable to continue this ramble, precisely one huge elaborative writing of what has been done from epoch, though it might prove to be of little use, however in this study, too much might be too dangerous because we aren’t theology student of any kind, not even in the philosophy of the present man.

This basic knowledge of discovering whom the devil is, prove has a sensible adequate domesticity background information, the best to have, as knowledge permit in knowing how to play the devil without becoming the devil. One thing need to be clear as crestal in your mind and that thing is; don’t be too enticed to loose your mind but be exceptionally foresighted and remain focused.

I think a few people will appreciate the memory of this to be a progressive practise since man has understood wisdom. And known how to apply wisdom or force into each daily living. However nobody will mindedly openly admit and submit to a self-absorbed ego by accepting the fact that he was and is actually playing the devil rather palpable to console the conscience and embrace a form of lily-white, is the use of a rare accustom phrase ‘ I am playing God’. Just like a liar will never tell you he will be lying.

There’s the probability they did not understand what they were doing. Does a liar not know? or a murder not know? Do thieves and deceivers not know;? I supposed that is one thing the devil will not want you to understand. The funniest ego we all have been wrapped up with, was the imagination and the thought entrenched in both the conscious and the unconscious mind of our, of angels. Many immature mind is choke already with the sound of angels; Such a pleasant thing, I do agree, however, angels were not of the earth like man and the devil. The devils you have with you all the time but the angels you don’t have with you all the time, if at all you have them. Most people have sum this up regretfully, to coin the phrase; ‘better the devil I know than the angel I know not’. Morally I don’t buy that being a perfect thing to emphasis upon because a taste of heaven is a taste of heaven even if you ware to die and depart to hell. You should not spend all life and eternity in obliviousness.

We’ve taken of the subject at hand however, we have not focus attention on the analysis, the aspect attached with playing the devil which is persistently looming in our mind within this previously define mindscape.

How do you play the devil ? and, when can you play the devil ? might to ask- if you are privileged to get away with it. This is to tell you that even the devil don’t often get away with his acts.
This should think led him into such acts as lying and murdering. To steal and to deceive are his best acts.

The entire acts of the devil were mostly applied with force, these could be understood to be relatively far different from the luring apprehension of the mind, the thought and every reaction of target.
For a deceiver or a con artist to achieve any of his purposes he has to take the target through a perfectly lied functioning process to captivate and subsequently confine the target mind to an expected outcome. A close comparison in line with the incarceration, or the undeviating confinement of the thoughts and actions into one. The mindscape has to be locked into one.

Countless amount of alluring speeches with enough enticement were used to influence your thought drastically, this will form a mist of believability, this is a swap from your unbelief into accepting what they had judgementally predict you will think. Before coming in close contact with such ordeal, in both the mind and action, it is expedient to know that it’s useless to think of apprehending the devil, completely fruitless. His means of escape to keep virtue is his vice and belligerency. Devils were easily recognised, at any confrontation made, at close contact with the devil. And if there should be no clearly distinguished awareness of his presence, that obviously, is your funeral; what else ? obvious to any discerning heart, once the consciousness is blurred, you are left to your fate.
Your fate at the hand of a deceiver or a con: apparently they are the same person; is like the terrible midnight wind, the influence of the ethos, living you with an awakening conscience to wake up to in the morning thinking you just finished a day life soap opera

When confronted with the devil the only option open to you is a steadfast objection and rejection. That is surely applicable when you were not enticed yet. There is no reason to start playing a mind game, undetermined - leaving room for consideration. Also the same way playing a mind game will bring you down to his level, make you capable of thinking like he is thinking, you will have the tendency, a higher intensity of observing every details just like he does, this is like a prenatal agreement; a premature confusionist.

Your action might tell whom you are and thus open doors to future engagement, so also your reaction is an open invitation for trouble. And what more to add to it; trying to apprehend a person who is liable to implement a forceful action like lying, theft or murder is definitely an obvious invitation to trouble.

Lying, doesn’t come in under the jurisdiction of force on normal consequence however on this regard it collated as a forceful act mainly for it's origination and the circumstances that often warrant a lie. To all individual lie is a defence, a hiding place either to cover a shame or otherwise to make a gain. But unfortunately to most people it is a way of life. Lie is a vice.

Theft is a disease just as the lack that warrant the theft. The strength of theft is supposed to be in a lack however, to many it has become a way of life and what fixed them within this cubicle, to separate them from the other people alive is one strong force which has until that time entangled them like a spider web, it further subject their mind under one ruling conception of worth, authority, wealth and power., and further to this the mindset is one of a good understanding and intelligence. All this are fabrication of the real things, they were segregated individual, just a mindset, dummies on wheels.

This is a protection, a retribution and a vengeance, it’s terrible to know whom reap the satisfaction from a murder and whom bear the pain of murder. Does the dead cry? to know if they felt the pain of their death; yes, the dead do cry, the blood that were shed in wickedness supplicate for their lost and seek retribution from him who left them forlorn. Most dead tried desperately to live their lives again, the lost, wandering souls of the abyss. Murder is a great lost not to those that were alive only but to the one that were killed also.

So far the essential aspect of this analogy has not been reasoned out, basically the ground we’ve been able to cover seems like an awakening call to remember what we so often neglected. It will not have been far from the truth if our mind has conceive the idea that wicked acts have been fought and reed from our communities. Is it true or not? It isn’t, believing they have is a very dangerous mindset and what is around the corner is a bewilderment of the fool.

This is one mindset which will get disappointed after what it has been blinded from came into realisation. Being innocent is quite very charitable, but being blinded to the truth of the real world is stupidity. After you have been made a sucker, then and then only will people around you lament to you ‘welcome to the real world’.


Actions and reaction are simple mind originating influences; they sing song like a yellow dress in the sun. with a little word as the English slogan, you could be taken in; sold or giving away; ‘It’s good to talk.’ Where your action might stand as a warning signal your reaction might as well be termed as a green light.
These are basic signals, a give away to the watchful eyes. They do act as pre-em’s to yielding to the beguiling of the serpent. These will off-course first and foremost collate in the mind, then the face will tell the story or ask the question and followed by the body.

The risk of the person opposite you is taken is in your response. He might bluff his way into heaven but he’s got only one way and that is through Jesus Christ. They don’t waste time on any non - profiting individual, you have something he needed that is the reason you were been confronted. If he promise the entire earth at your disposal it is because he is getting it from you. well I could get somebody else but to him really ‘one bird in hand worth a thousand on the tree’. You could say No! or you could say Yes! But your yes is highly recommended, it will be of great regard consequently, faithfully rewarded. It’s no bullshit, it's the open truth.

It isn’t such a wicked act to play the devil; there will be a time that you either do it or you get done. Quite often, softness makes people becomes a victim of situations which they should have be the master. But when they were wounded, don't be surprised if they should turn into a gun rage murderer. Why is this so often the circumstances that smarten people up. You need to hurt them before they could take stern decision and when they do, you could tell the difference, because some will do it to the extreme, while some other folks knows when to stop, when to run, when to hide, and when to stay their ground. Before a fool's wrath is easily known.


In a short sense of the word to deceive it meant to con but on a wider view it envelopes the act of lying while in the real sense of it, it is purely beguiling – the effect of luring with enticement into doing what is contrary to yourself.
Deceive is often use in this composition mainly for its wide acknowledgement. Most people could relate to deceive easily but not the word beguile. Con is another word which has its meaning in law as deception or fraud. In the interest of this writing, beguile could be embraced more than deceiving or con because for its deep understanding and a compound word which combine different acts of deceit, not just deceit only but deceit with alluring temptation to arouse a desire.

The form beguiling took at a stand as to entice with pleasantness, it carries an emotion, it is a yielding from the heart not just the confusion of the mind which will erode away after a little time. A beguiler is seeking for the heart, is seeing for total commitment of oneself and will. To you the beguiler is like somebody who is trying hard enough to draw you out of a deep well, an eye opener, a deliverer. This is the work of beguiling, and it is very sweet to exercise and to listen to.

Finally, remove the sour from the lime, and the colour from the paint, could you imagine what is left likewise is beguiling without deceit; the lie. You will be damn too plain, very visible to any naked observation. what often does the trick is the lie and that is where the serpent hide, it is his covering.


We are one step away from perfecting a very common act which every one in a thousand soul tried effortlessly to resist. For they were easily prone to this act because they tried to avoid it .
Why were they in such a turmoil to avoid lots of things and yet they has never achieve the endurance to resist it.
Most people found themselves lying while they don’t want to lie. Most found themselves falling for deceit and beguiling while they were watching their steps actually being vigilant. They fell into the trap of con men because they were cautious of their actions too dam much to prevent such occurrences. Why did what you fear most often come to you at the last end.

On the other hand, most people were pregnant non-thoughtlessly with the ideas of getting away with lies and deceiving. Why do they lie and not be able to get away with it? Why do you lie and never get what you want ?

Strategic thinking deployed precisely is as precious as the water you drink. Observing this at a different angle; let say for example a substance such as water has got it's own tactics of functioning when taking at precise time otherwise it will become a residue within you, which of course might be of use at latter days but first and foremost you will have to beer the burden before it is put to work. it's tactics is thirst. This is example of precise deployment of decisions. Signals and signs. Actions and reaction.

The value placed upon this preciseness in deployment of decision; in action and reaction; in signs and signals that will still be manifesting in every step taken on this rear reasoning. (aetiology). And by the time you finish this book you will never be the same person again, never again.

We are one step away from perfecting a common act which man has never but one in a thousand resisted. This is lie. How to know it is not to be involve in it. When you find it hard to resist lie the solution is not to tell it. A lair does not recognise a lie, though he knows he lies but he can tell not who else does it. But one thing is sure, he knows the truth when he sees it. Confusion is often around a liar. Like wonders and bewilderment surround a fool.

Sit on the fence for a while, this mind test will open your understanding of the people around you. Tell a lie, notice how many believe, accept or even reject you. then turn around again, tell a truth of a different thing; notice how many people reject, accept or question you. this will often work on the silence ones too. The kind of people that reserve their judgement, they couldn't do it both times without falling out on you. Another positive result of this is that you have the consciousness of both.

When somebody does this to you, if you were the 'I reserve my comment type' don't do it the second time or else you become a fool. One way out is to walk away before the second try. But if you respond to the first you must as well listen to the second.


A question to ask is why do people lie and they don't get what they wanted, or be found out ? two things is in close relation with this; one you either be a poor blinded liar or secondly you don't know how to lie. A blinded liar will reveal himself as being desperate, unstable and afraid of being found out. But a good liar will have weighted the consequences before he lied. Being blinded to the lie you are telling is another issue resulting from desperation need and necessity.

The question of not obtaining the result needed is a substantially good question to consider and often an emotional one because a liar is emotionally tied to the result of the lie, emotionally, he has to display a kin interest in the person he' s lying to this thus spelling out the difference between success and failure. Just to what my mum often tells me; never tells a lie which won't cover your heels.

At often times your lies with purposes shamefully falls not as a desirable means, but an irresistible, all means necessity which at the point might seems a life wire. if it break, permeated, then you are done, finished. It is only a fool who will lie for fun when it is not needed and serve no purpose whatsoever. Therefore to enjoy the benefit of your risk, you will need to know how to do it right. Many people often get away with lies, some were good while others were blatantly stupid. Some of the greatest lies ever told, if they were discovered it will cause chaos, and disbelieve .

Still these question remains unanswered; why did you play the devil and it doesn't work or why do you lie and don't ever get what you want. There is a simple answer; you never does it like the serpent . You can be the devil and do your thing, you can resist the devil catch him at his act but you cannot catch the serpent in the devil. And when you kills the devil, you can never find the serpent dead with the devil.

Another reason and the most prominent one among all others that people fail with lying is because they lie twice or more for a single cause. If you lie too much you will be caught in a net that was not set for you.

Is it a surprise to find the snail dead outside it's shell ? it has to have been an extraordinary performances such as the ones only the serpent can make. It is very relevant as before to understand the differences between these two creatures, moreover never in any doctrine have they been identified as two, having two different nature and life . The serpent has ever since been called the same as the devil and the serpent. None I mean no doctrine or man has it ever come into his mind to differentiate between the two.

Apart from committing a tragic theological offence, an error against one doctrine of the scripture which as ever resisted to separate the two creatures but mysteriously placed them as one and a single being. But through various studies and deep reasoning the revelation of the two nature suffice.

Here is the mystery of the devil who was made by the beast, the serpent, which through corny errors has falling into the form of a creepy animal. This is the theological perspective. Whatever the devil did is the product of the serpent habitual presence with him, otherwise the fall to the deceit of the serpent. The serpent discover the lie, deceit, beguiling, alluring and whatever. And , the devil did the lying, improvise the murdering and device theft. Very sociable; isn't it ? Condemnations - this are what rule the world around you and the devils. And probably the devils now is a bared truth.

But a mystery of this nature could be remould as history to this wakening age to create an atmosphere of greater understanding within these confused claustrophobic detailing of what should naturally be ignored as obscene indoctrination and misleading of human being. Mystries is a misleading knowledge confused firstly in itself before it lead. There should be no misconception whatsoever in the mind, as to how far fetched the details of such reasoned study as this could entails and the kind of individual which it may revive, recreate or even diminished. Basically a notion of this kind, of what might have been suggested as an adaptation of a past historical occurrences studiously laid down from era of accountability. May by many still obscure reasons they were conserve and remain a mystery, however reasoning and thought will not despise us further. If we were to compose a thoughtful and reasonable account of these events, though an incontestable baseless for our accounts.

Where there is a devil in most people or each person walking the street, who is the saint ? That is actually not relevant, to avoid such prejudice we simply could channel our thought to, to observe where the serpent is ? Referring to the knowing.

Where there is a conformation and addiction to an habit, generically, by inheritance or simply by a conscious or unconscious adaptation of such a habit would either be to honour or derogatory. More like being hooked on drug, and observe the inverted depreciation inclined to oneself. With a creative mindset of this kind you will live above such adaptation and addictions. It is the mindset of the Mastermind.

From the mastermind reasons and purpose is implemented into every action of the being. Pluto has indoctrinate on acting with reason without which the action is falsified. A folly and lame action ensuing without philosophy, principle and reason fostered towards a “real good” or “apparent good” such actions are chanced to spiritism or otherwise as often said of the illit to be that ill- forbidding omen called fate. To do nothing about a circumstances is what is often released to the hands of fate. Is it fate who do what the person could not do? Or the action of other man is constricted by such circumscriptive portents.

Put these in a good order, analysed this? Adaptation to an habit and it's conformation, when being hooked precede ever before any generic introduction, inheriting such habit. An habit is a very influencing thing and as a result could be very very catchy- finding it's way into the unconscious mind of another less opportune person. Adaptation in clinching to the habit is a moral honour and beneficiary. Further to this, such habit could be inherited -influenced through generation.

All along till now we have tread upon a delicate edge of the biblical doctrine which anybody within the Christendom might want to object to even challenged with a prove. However that isn't perturbing. Is the fate the religion held and not a destiny; Fate is not bound by a law but it bound the man that use to its law. Destiny observe the materialist physical law or the world- idea; the religion observe philosophical moral acts; a philosophical man could not be afflicted by much error than he knows of, his affliction is the soundness of his philosophy. The man is not often at fault because soon he would be the same as the philosophy which he is instructed by, with this assertion, reckon every man responsible to be assertive of the right moral justification of his acts.

How do we pictured this and compose it into what we have already established in our mind. The induction to the act of playing the devil also stress the danger of becoming the devil. Instead to merely playing, setting the mind as to that of the devil or more above that of the devil, the man should relegate his devilishness to subordinates. The mindset which bring into existence a circumstances without your veto is the devil mindscape and is ruled by the serpent habitual presence with you. Meaning the ideas that bear sway in you that brink about the mistakes in your actions.
The danger incubate within these such a mindscape has been notched, it is of the mind and also of the life involved. Total dominion under the devil is a persisting evil but where you will want to be and developed is a mind that precede over that of the devil, that which bring to past the present circumstances or predicament and fixation of condition. This is easily obtainable with the mastermind. A mindset that is more advance in time to a circumstance.

This is a contagious issues, I am not trying to make more devils but merely to see through wisdom in depth and in height. Philosophically as it was indoctrinated, the serpent has a connotation as being wise even being a liar. However, reasoning might suggest that the serpent wasn't a liar but an instigator of liars. The liar being the devil.

It's good to think we were copying the devil and trying to see where the serpent was in the devil. but we were not copying the devil, we were mastering the devil and observing the tactics and ideologies of the serpent in you. But you are becoming the devil and can't even display a tactic of the serpent yet to temporise the sways. What is happening is that while you were concentrating on being or copying the devil the serpent is making you into one grand devil. You never see the serpent because you were looking at the devil however reasons suggest that without the serpent there is no devil. The devil we are mastering is ourself and the serpent is the higher authority and lower authority to some, not because of wits but because of what they were sway by.

You are becoming a devil ! most people are devils ! while in some the devil dwell in them. Which is more ? those that were the devil or those that the devil dwell in ?
Now are you being wise as the serpent ? if you were you, won't you be turning into a devil or have the devil dwelling in you. is it of a force or a logic ? it is an open principle observable?
Remember while you are the devil you implement force and while you are the serpent you conceal behind an outpouring poisonous ardour of fear.

There is a gentleness of the serpent which go beyond that of the dove, but the aura of danger which breath around the serpent obscure this. This is even becoming rapidly known to even the dead conscious individual travelling through phases of life to another life.

In most cases, even the most conscious person could not improvised otherwise the instigation of the serpent which makes them the devil remain formidable; while they were trying to be wise as the serpent it would not be in this existence and this lifetime.
I there henceforth submit these as a analysis of the most world renowned worldly inter agency. The masterminding of the serpent will remain a goal achieved only of the mastermind as instigation is the driving force use by fate. Fate instigate to action in variance to projected plan.

In this prolong analytical disclosure of the nature of the devil and the serpent which has precedes the established working mindset of the devil and whomever endeavour to operate with the mind of the devil 'playing the devil'. How is it to be discovered that you might have already become the devil or being influenced by the devil ? that is a no mistake, though a total failure at being wise. Its' a make do, it spelt a defeat by the serpent. You have never grown to be as wise as the serpent in you that sway at every turn of the road, even some make do as the devil, instinctively unobjectable , they were being dominated by the serpent even the devil of others.

Most people do things unconsciously, either out of habit or through practise. There is always a basis. Functioning ethos for every action and reaction. Where some are unconsciously wise, most were consciously stupid. But what we were aiming toward is the perspectives of the conscious wise. A conscious doer.

Practically speaking in this entire content and what we will be doing is a Purely practical action. Now we have an enormous amount of philosophical insight, we have taken a giant step away from being enslaved by the devil mentality to confronting the serpent itself in us or should I stress further as the serpent in the devil. Now we play with the serpent in us and not the devil we were made to be.

This is to learn to be practically wise as the serpent which inversely you're playing the devil. Explaining this thus; while you were strenuously attempting to do what is said in this etiological composition of the common mindscape of the ruling principles (principalities) of this world, don't be such a stupid ass to neglect factual aspect of the mind which is prone to changes of all kinds. It is infectious and corruptable, this is what you are doing to other people, neglect not the fact that yours too is delicately constructed to accept or be tuned to such contagious influences. You should be doing what the serpent is doing and don't be a devil rather I should prefer that you own a devil. Well somebody has suggested that there is always an evil side to every good one; I will prefer that you have this evil but not in you. The evil that men has is what has been lured by the serpent, being ignorant of his ways he is left with the malignment of his disdainful obedience. What need do he has to abhorring this obedience after it has transpired?

Soon you should start instigating everything to your own good, beguiling most affection, emotion, and thus winning hearts. A verse in the scripture said a person that wins heart is a wise man'. On this understanding, the serpent stand as a wise, and cunning beast, while the devil become the destroyer, a tool of the serpent used for his purpose. He has a plan at hand before he lure man into murdering, beguiling will be an appropriate word to emphasis in unravelling non violence deceit incorporated I presume. Instigating, Tempting, Beguiling and Lying all fell into the brain chambers of the serpent while the destructive work fell into that of the devil; such as Thieving, killing and suffering. Own a devil and don't be a devil or be owned by the devil.


The time has come and this is the age of openness disclosure of all mysteries and knowledge and as from this time onward how hard you will find it to hide anything even your heart. Your life is taking from you and constructed for a purpose; you are a tool for a scheme designed by a brain, a mind just like the one you can develop through doing what you have been made to believe is a false doctrine. Well everyone seems to be wise nowadays that they needed to made themselves a fool for somebody sake. But consequently nobody will admit being a fool or subject to the fact of being a fool except the feeble minded. Even a fool will rage like an animal when he realised he has been done. It is obvious, you won't want to be a friend to a fool; they will definitely be shamed for it. But however, the world around you is into your personal life to control. And it's only an idiot that will pity a fool. When the serpent is taking many for a penny of foolishness and making a devil of most feeble minds and simple beings.

When everyone is able to identify who is a fool and who is not it is rear, hardly in occurrence for you to witness a fool in argument over intelligence but most probably in rages. But through an introspective perception of this present time, an ethos that has falling upon man claimed a lot of certainty from the intelligence mindscapes. Or presumably, most of the ones we often walk in before has been locked and reserved in another chamber of our mind. Apparently many will leave theirs at some place unknown where a lot is suggested to have been left at your various points of confusion. This lead to the hypnotic suggestion that the wakening of the computer cause so much confusion to few and dented the mind and intelligence of few. However this isn't a good excuses; where it's meant to be for advance it should not be a cause for retardation . but it does breed dull looking faces, which makes them looks like they have lost their appetite for life.

What comes next to education to claim the intelligence of the educated is a good thinker, it will wrestle with the mind of the educated and might prevail if it is of a good initiative. A good thought with motivation implemented properly has the ability to go beyond the standard of the educated mindsets foreseeable. Judging from past experiences and inventions; the present education standards were set from the works of good thinkers.

Thinking is something we are used to doing, and the lest of it the faster and profitable you are likely to be. Depending on what you are thinking about but by some bizarre nature some people's thinking is done for them; while some will pay some a lot more than a days pay on stuffs that will assist the thinking for them. Devils don't think ! they were prompt by the serpent and the killing instinct within them. The surviving, acceptance and ruling instinct. Generated from desolation, rejection, and hatred. Their goal is to be accepted and to rule. apparently it's is very correct to state that the serpent is there thought chamber. Anyway, since you will never catch the serpent in the devil it is hard for you to acknowledge how they arrived at the position found.

Apart from thinking, premeditated acts is the a tool of the serpent although it is generated from reasonable thoughts and observation. Both instigation, beguiling and lying were acts seriously nourished and often premeditated before presenting them.

In short to play the devil, there is need for you to be a peaceful delicate non-thinker but instinctive active. This is the key to mitigating the risk of failure, being red-handedly incapacitated and in another form, the risk of conformation, addiction and adaptation. By this you can build up and follow up on a strategy; an action which the reaction is determined by the principle invested; and thus be wise as the serpent and never be used. which means you can afford not being the devil. Acting by a philosophy is investing success into every action.

Most could have guess out what playing the devil involve, but for the advantage of many whom has not, the principle is based upon using people to motivate people and get what you want and not be used. Manipulation and being manipulated; corrupting or being corrupted is choices you must make.
Most people has been down this road before which they call playing God, when they were actually the devil. Don't wait till you were identified as the devil know what you were doing. What is the devil to man and what is man to the devil; same as asking what is God to man and what is man to God? The devil is the man and control the world man lives in and God ask man to reject the devil and take control of things rather than leaving it for the devil or otherwise following the tracks of the devil, which is falling for the tricks of the serpent.

In his life time hardly could a man ever achieve playing God; without deceiving one, lying to one and still remains on top as God, presuming that is where God is meant to be. But in our own way we are the gods of our own life and should be that the lord of our own decision. God does not sin, man sin and is it possible to be the devil and not sin?

Everything sensibly judged and observed through the eyes of principles and the laws which means you have the ability to excel in thought above the reach of the law. Although the law never stop being amended, that is because they can not think and see everything through at a time. And what the heck? They were meant to create fear and control. Of what ? Consequently What is it that needs to be control? Simple. As a matter of fact; it is not the world you were living in, but it is the people that is living in that world you were living in. To control you and to control me!
Logically the law could be wrestled but human sensibility and leadership suggest that it is only a fool that will say there is no need for the law. Devils are chronic of the law.

The obvious apparent inclination of the devils acts are crimes, sins and punishment of errors. This is where their wisdom is established and euphonium.
But is it possible to be the devil or play the devil and not sin or commit any crime otherwise ? This presently still remains as an hypothesis but on another phase of this study we shall look into establishing this hypothesis as a proven theory practicable and it's possibility.

Another insight I will want to discuss and open up on this observation is the possibility of playing the devil and not tell a lie simply being yourself. Or the Serpent and not tell a lie? The voicing of not telling a lie sound more like old preacher sermon however how far could an ordinary person go without telling a lie and what will it get him?

As we all has the capability to chose to murder, thieve and not to, it is a choice and a good one to consider. Although it is soiled upon most hearts the simple law of nature and human conscience "thou shall not kill" this is what considering although you are not going to be saving the whole world which in any existence nobody has ever achieve doing so: who can save the world? Who will dear endeavour to venture into saving the world. Every one ever to embark on such ventures end up killing most of the people dwelling in the world; even Jesus end up killing three third of the entire world population in his attempt.

If there should be magic in deceit, beguiling, alluring and temptation I suppose, and most should recognise that the magic come from the lie within. The delusion, confusion and off course most often curiosity that would confront the victim of the deceiver from the lie told is what gives way to his purpose. Like the enigma held within the sighting of darkness.
Lie will bring all this including confusion and when you can not analyse the truth from the lie told you will be opt to give in, with people that don’t give in easily they will loose both ways. They argue and conflicted, so they lost the person and probably most often the price except they were physically stronger. But most ancient philosophy will tell you that wisdom is better than strength. When you are cheated by someone and you accept it as a defeat you win yourself a friend, the only angle left taking care, is not to be defeated on the same trick twice.

When you are cheated by someone and you accept it as a defeat you win yourself a friend the only angle left taking care of is not to be defeated on the same trick twice.
Many con masters are good liars, which is hard to penetrate; you will need a few heads to tackle their lies. But what makes the difference in their lies is how it was told and when it was told. Foolishness is merely in most cases a blind angle (sight); where you fail to reckon with or diminishes it's importance unnecessarily. If any is able to reason and play you out at this angle you will be caught in a foolishness so underestimation is never a good proper attitude to display.

We have observe lie from a direct insinuation and it's purposes. This is to deceive and win or otherwise escape the clutches of the present danger. Why this lies were never successful is because it is not told on a blind spot, on curiosity, on foolishness, on need and on urgency. A lie is meant to act on the subject predilection.

The man whom come to become the devil first lied but his lies were without reasonability – without the knowledge of the person he was lying to, and he did to his ruin. A blind liar.
When I was growing up, I have was told a very common sense which is to ‘tell a lie that will cover your heels’-
What stop me from lying or even thinking about it was because I could not tell one without getting caught in. ‘one that can cover my heels’ and somehow by an intuitive concept I could not tell one again . then I learnt the wisdom which existed without the lie.

What makes people lie often was the earnest need to escape that impossible situation they have called upon themselves. Their only escape will be to lie; most ended up being known as poor liars, petty liars, stinky liar, and blind liars.
People tends to leave them alone because of their stinks, and the poverty of their lies. Poor Stinky liars. Where others were being chased about for the curiosity, darkness of their lies they were at flee from and send away, left alone they were 'vagabond’

Present inclination will suggest that there are different kinds of lies, staging from the person urgent reasonability at displaying themselves as reasonable normal individual; a little white lie now and then will soon escalate.
Where a liar will start lying right from the beginning of confronting him, even when they do tell the truth they won’t be believed.

There is a lot of difference in reserving the lie to use as the confusionist, delusion or curiosity than using it as a defence. When the lie is the least, and last , it is prompt to confuse, delude and be a cause of curiosity.

In all to all, I suppose playing the devil is more to becoming the devil- To mastermind the devil you will need to play as the serpent and with a few good mind you will even master the serpent and prevail him at his own tricks. Running away is not victory it's being cautious.
And the last note; ‘ you don’t need to look green before you can play the devil’.

Wednesday 13 June 2007

What the fool do (Unedited)

Clothes :- “ Does the clothe makes the Man?” or the man makes the clothe”

I was reading through a book when I came across the expression; “the Clothes makes the Man” Instantly something within me disagree with the statement. There is foolishness in statement that needs to be set straight. It does not issue out of good knowledge that I should call a word of the wise. He stinks of misguide notions which I can bet will kill the man that stick to it than makes him live. Probably that is what it was intended to do who am I now disqualifying their work. And I think I can save those they intended to mislead by that wrong knowledge.

Let's try this channel of thought, at vista face, to think through the essence of clothe to the man. Him being the 'be' factor affected by the statement. ‘Man makes the Clothe’ and ‘the Clothe makes the man’.
One speaks of why the clothe was made and the other speaks as in the appearance it talks like gold in hand’. Where the clothe makes the man, it is apparently certain that the man has lost his essence even though his appearance is like gold in hand. Clothe is a creativity and no means a creatorship.

“Appearance is acceptability” but never the less the clothe does not count more than the man in it. Does it define a person? You put the clothe above the man if the clothe makes the man, the man should show out of the clothe not the clothe shown out of the man. However, I still think that the; ‘clothe is made for the man, man makes the clothe not the clothe the man.’


Money :- ‘Man makes the money, not the money the man’.

I dearly love the Americans when it comes to telling a simple plane truth directly to the face of anybody without prejudice. They are known to speak their heart, making their feelings known not like the Britons whom I kind of have grown accustomed to. They will tell you to keep your feeling to your self, and save yourself some complicated explanation. Simply let your Yes be Yes and your No be No. Politeness and pleasantness and else more, stick to procedure. I somehow got so bored to death with the silly procedures and the mind thing without putting it into words to the next person.

I first heard from an American mouth the expression; ‘Make the money, don’t let the money make you’.
What it is cut down to is that a wise person will make the money while in that of a fool, the money makes the person. “The wise will makes the money while the fool get made by the money” in awkward sort of way both are with money.

There are some that the money makes and they live because many of them will be dead while there are those that make the money. There doesn’t seems to be any other alternative route for a man to take than to make the money, get made by the money, or don’t have a live of your own at all. The indoctrinate ground factor of the entire survival of man is that he’s got to have the money somehow by any means possible because ‘money answers all questions’.

By an unequal determinant factor which still could not be accounted for, money has found its way into the life and blood stream of man like the ichors in the veins of the gods and what made it expedient to make the money remains in the unsolved mystery. Maybe when it is solved, we could get rid of money essentiality which means there will be non any wiser.

Money still possess an unparalleled control which justify the popular expression that money rules the World. To bridle this unabated authority connoted to money by this expressions is the effort made to strengthen the mind of each individual that; ‘Man makes the world go round’

If many unthougthful person should argue blindly to the last iota of their vowels, that the expression ‘money rule the world’ is a right quote emphasising the dominant influence of money. They might be quoted right however that should be counted and indoctrinate as the foolishness of the unthougthful minds. What and who made man that foolish?
I could not account for it in a single expression so I decided to use a single word ‘money’
‘money is the foolishness of man’

It is essential that we clarify this issue about money with this person – The fool’
Let the fool say for its justification; ‘Money is the root of all evil’. Yes he is right nevertheless, will you justify him for not having money on that account?

A fool needs to be fed, if he willingly will submit to the obvious physical fact that he can’t do it by himself. If he should allow you, he will be wise for that account.
A fool cannot make money; a true philosophy.

Whence a few mind will hold the fact that a fool can make money, in the same place, many will disagree and adamantly stick to the fact that he does not know how to even make the money.
Finally, if man makes money, who does the money makes?


LAZINESS :- “levity is ill but laziness is due no exception ”

You could easily think of a better way to spend the day and whom to spend it with. But in solitude of one own world there are few choices left to chose from that could possibly pays ones dues.

Thinking of a better way to pass the day, right from the morning till late in the night. If not watching television Reading books, playing games on the computer or the Internet, there are few other choices left. What do you discover?
The day is young and free, nothing to do and if there is I don’t feel like doing anything worth the thought, thinking of what to do will often times come to the same result- not doing anything.
Instead of wasting precious time to return to do the first thing at last, why not do the first thing first, anyway it’s even the simplest thing to do, anyone could see that - Thinking

When the day started with a good breakfast, after the breakfast, there are various program to watch on the TV. This could be done laying back in bed in front of the television– if the TV is in the bedroom. Normally the best time for such is on the weekends and Sundays but what the heck, what is good to Sundays is good to Monday and the rest .
Thinking of the best and relaxing way to watch TV I would suggest laying back will prove the best because you can doze off and if you were laying back, it serve the best.
You know in the morning TV program could be very boring especially if there is no cable television or Sky television. At this time, dozing off in front of the TV screen might not be easily avoided, which even makes it simple because where we are heading to is thinking away into day dreaming.
Like that, laying back in-front of the TV, which is less important, except at period of special program. You could dream away – off into a pleasant sleep doing the things you have thought of, or imagined yourself doing in real life. Dreams could be very actively connect to actual life and presently occurring activities.
That is still short –coming to pleasure, dreams were never made to last a life time, just because you are never made to a sleep at once for a life time. One dream could not last you a life-time; you will need another and another to live by everyday. More the same way to when you were sleeping . To keep you dreaming is the reason you need to sleep ever so often. Dreaming makes a good sleep more enjoyable. This is revealing; but fantasy, this is very pleasant, more pleasant and can last longer than dreaming.

A good difference between dreaming and fantasising is the control that involve within. True to knowledge, you can control yourself when you are fantasising but you can hardly or not even be able to control yourself when you are dreaming. Little or total lack of control is a factor that deprive the mindset of certain pleasure.

You could just fantasise away just about when you were waking from a slumber dream if,
Supposing the dream wasn’t frightful. Lots of things to choose from to spend endless time on fantasising even a life time is never enough for what you enjoy doing. One or two of the best place people often look toward is their music idol, best friend, movie star and sex partner. You can even fantasise on a new car you have been dreaming of buying; think yourself driving it, just about as little of the whole lot of what people find indulging to spend time on.
Indulge yourself in something dreaming and pleasant. What is more to fantasy is that you could pick up where you stop the last time. It is just fantastic. Doing it this way, you will at the end have a kind of fantasy that could go on and on like the tales in the Arabian Nights.

If you were to look into the dictionary, the definition for fantasy first establish the fact of it being a pleasant day dreaming. A longed for but unlikely to happening; a product of the imagination and finally a vision of things desire.

By all chance, we should concentrate on the visionary aspect of the definition of fantasy. Vision, firstly is defined by the same dictionary as an image conjured up vividly in the imagination; and the ability to perceive what is likely, and plan wisely for it; A fore sight, An image communicated supernaturally.

Vision is totally outside the body, the limitation of the mind away from the present presence into the past or the future presence. That is to say therein that fantasy of the present is the imagination of the future event and memory of the past. Anticipating the splendour of the future and indulging to dwell in it .
Many people could be taken away by the mindset of what could come out the power of imagination.
Does this described your ideal pleasant way to pass away time and live one day at a time while planning for the future. You will need to move around also and keep the dream alive.


IDLENESS :- “An idle hand the Devil use”

Akin to laziness, like a twin born of a parent on a day before the other. Both were alike and bear similar trade marks. I never set eye on an idle person without noticing his laziness.

The best time I often indulge in a lazy act is mostly on Saturday. What makes the difference between idle and lazy is that; lazy do not want to do and idle cant find to do. I kind of reckon both were acceptable due to disregard of employment and exception. No joking about it, I am often lazy on weekends and Sundays especially when I’ve got my girlfriend around the house for the weekend. And some other times she comes with her friends. But what’s the heck? I do that because I’ve got room for other things in my life; like writing and reading which I do quite often. Apart from this, and you lazy buggers, what have you got to loose from endless hours spent doing nothing. Nothing to loose, especially when you’ve got people around you to do those things you will normally spend endless time doing not considering being boring. Better if those times are rather spent doing something you will enjoy, non will be the wiser.

One philosophical mindset suggest that; hardly will you get told off for doing nothing, at least not by most people, but you will get told off for bugging other people and for something done the wrong way. And for doing something others don't want, cannot do or don't like you doing.
People would be on the defensive when what you are doing they can do not, offensive when it would affect them, and reproachful when you do it the wrong way, other words, make a mess of it. They would only tends to indifference in that what is done is before their knowledge.


What has been notice is that, recently, in the present years, from a candid outlook, it is a fanciful indulgence – the least you could become is a coach potato.
However where most people were getting told off for trying to do something and as a result get in other people’s way, you could save yourself the pain of such insulting inception.

Reckon you can figure out what idleness is and what makes people idle. Is it a problem or just a symptom of the mind at work so often? Does this have anything to do with the real you? And if it does what difference is it likely to impact upon your life?.

Voices

Hi,



I have just start to write a new novel. The manuscript is still in its first draft process.

I am not sure when I will finish with this but I am looking to finish the first draft this summer. Yes! its' going to take me up to Ninety days(three months) to finish it.





Here is the concept to the new novel:





RAPTURE!

Rapture of the Psychotics!






This is the title and the plot:

VOICES





In a little town in the south of England; a psychiatrist suddenly shot himself and leaves a recorded message of his own suicide. The people did not think little of it, but the police seemed satisfied. Except that his death is to lead to the begining of the end of the world. A mighty voices errupted, it is heard by third of the population; coming from the winds and the cloud. The prophecy is coming to pass. The rapture of the soul on earth is begining. With everyone discovering its other nature, the unconsiouse self ................


While the Psychiatrist board is busy analysing the situation to know its cause and cure. The federal agencies want the man responsible. They need to stop him before he spread it worldwide. It is for a time. How long have they got?





They want to speak....


They want to be heard......


They want to be believed.....





Voices





They are in the air, in the sky.


They all can hear it;


Anyone that hears it, is never to remain the same again for the time.





Today.................................



Hi there,


I have finish the draft but the funiest tit bit is that I do not know how good or bad it is.
I am thinking of having it on my blog pretty soon. Just working on it, it will be posted pretty soon.


FM.











Tuesday 12 June 2007

Judgement of the fool (Unedited)

“Foolishness is in the Heart of a Child, but the rod of correction will send it off”


As a proactive pungent truth is… you don't like this guy known as the fool, and another resemble insinuating proximity like congruence of thing is; in influx. He does not like himself, now that do seem not like your average dense fool. This is pointing to a person once in the arms of Morpheus, on rebound from an early stupor slumber from the entire reality. It is very much akin to a revivalist whom just assume to the wake of the world around him. But what differentiate him from the fool you make-an active fool or self created fool – a passive fool and that, that was assumed pretentiously and the unperceiving god- fool. Him be weary of – he is innocent, precarious and has no sin that you can assail him with. For he's the proairesis of his life willed in course before the timidity of time.
What is so abhorring in this guy to have to incur so much repulsive aura about himself?
If left not, to his inefficacious, mulish and cultivated abstruse to reason, which still make rooms for a conclusive gene juxtaposition of one's own complete cognisant of his reality and his mental aptitude. They should be the same, one would suppose except that the mind is heavy with task, ideals, and concept of himself and others the reality ensuing constrict him to do. This is proposed as in the act ons’ or, and, to fully generate believes that would probable re-generate a physical reality of his mind conceptions.

A rare and several mental disorder 'Austism', developing in early childhood with characters in learning difficulties, extreme self absorption, inability to relate to other people and the outside world. Latter in year it would be followed by a strong resistance to changes in the familiar surrounding and some disorder in the body known as repetitive body movements. People with this disease are mostly disabled at physically helping themselves and others.

Inability of a person to take thoughtful actions and reasons for his actions and purpose will fail most people in competitive life of his surrounding. Of such as which foolishness is made. A fool is made by people and not born as a human. By god and not own volitions, by deeds and not by action, by course and not by curse.

You could spell out a fool from your own dictionary with as little a word as the four letter word that credited it. ‘F O O ….. L’.
That being in word, is not akin to the expressive understanding of the word in mind Not to elaborate uselessly on the meaning, the person of the word outspan the technical relative meaning as it comes to be more at question than the word did with a corrosive Superstitious derivation.

‘Man hate a fool, so does God’

One real truth which is constantly amusing, there exist two body possibly with the ability to create, whom stood against the influences of a fool upon them. Condemnation that is worst than the cross of Christ, is brought down upon anyone caught in the web of foolishness and non will dare venture into showing an iota kindness to such individual. Its the spider's web, the taking is for the meal.

Often at times, I do, but now i have grew accustomed to, calling a person ‘A fool’ in very common
way. Every lips is awry regretfully, and presumably justified by knowing, at sometimes in the progression of affair with a boiling anger must have mutter the word, some with a delicate preciseness which the victim could not denial. It’s right, a damn truth it is and a heard capsule to swallow, not the absurd truth of admitting to the fact of being a fool only but to the shamefulness which convict the fatality.

Curiosity has got the best of me, from the ever rapping voices around, here and there, people discovering there innermost being, that of the reality of the other person around them. It's more a pungent air to breath with the animosity and loneness accordance which surround the life of any person revealed or recognised in his impudent foolishness.

Is it that a fool does not has a heart? Was he not born with one or what actually was this fool created from ? There has to be an answer somewhere in the secret secluded, destitute and desperation of the heart. When the heart is the man, obviously the man is a thinking can. A fool is destitute of a heart, a thought and apparently the intelligence of a fore sight and visions of a thinking heart.

But a few out of the whole lot will accept their foolishness, the incompetence of going above the strategic line of an idiot. Accepting a verdict of foolishness, one will often call an open mind to instruction and thus a step from ignorant to understanding. This withdraw the wicked heart that blocks the heart of a fool and stops his thoughts like the shell of a snail.

“Wickedness is in the mind and soul of a fool but he can not do it”

This has not been practically investigated it is merely a theory, which the visibility of its reality is beyond speculation. Many things have been made apparent in this age, many being dotted in black and white while some few remain in grey areas.

Visible part of the thoughts of a fool is believe and accounted for to proceed from countless pains, sorrows which comes from regret, rejection, shame, destitution and desperation. Of these is the fool made before these he is.

One person get fooled while the other becomes the wise one, very common occurrences
like the attitude of the serpent against mankind then the devil against every other man.
Hardly will anyone open up to be fooled, that is what tells the difference, those that master the situation at hand, with a conscious mind lay in wait ever potent and the only one to avert the tricks and evade the traps of a masterful minder.

I can tell a fool when it walks bye, merely looking at him because I can easily discern and fish him out and that’s to say I will call him a fool ‘a fool often rang a bell when he walks bye’.

What makes one a fool and the next person wise ?

I should think that is when one person is unable to go beyond that idiot over there, which is what I called the strategic line of thought of an idiot. The boldness to act is often cornered with a certain amount of fear, bread out of ignorant. The inability to solve a confronted problem is denoted with the foolishness therein.

“Principles is master to a fool because he cannot attain it”

like a bowl of bone in front of a dog so is principles to a fool, a dog is fooled with bones, it could not complete the battle of trying to break it, it merely lost taste, then left so is principle to a fool.

Ignorant, far from speculation, it is an inhabiting diseases, the fool comes from the ignorant endeavours of which a continuing endless efforts will afterward breed a foolishness.

Should not a man be free to express himself ?
After a great good knowledge of the scripture the entire doctrine of the scripture, I might conclude is laid upon a basic emphasis and that emphasis is for you not being a fool and those that continue in there foolishness were set forth towards destruction.

They are slaves, slavery which comprises of back bending labour without a show for it, at the end conjure up foolishness which is very apparent to every eyes that can see. Such is the continue endless efforts.

The scripture emphasis the need to be wise, it create principles, many like the birds on the sea-shore , how many can you identify.?

When one is identified with a particular species then one is enlightened for that course in classification. These species not being the bird per-say but the principles withheld within the doctrines of the scripture. Apart from that, principles were made out of errors, just like fool were made out of wisdom.

It is the simple fact of a person getting wise from his errors and the next person becoming a fool from the same errors so – ‘Principles were made out of errors, the same way foolishness is made from errors’.

I suggest a fool should forget his name so often to made apparent his inability then we might have compassion and designate that has a disability – Deficiency in memory.

“Foolishness is not a disability, it is simply foolishness”

On the ground of slavery, a slave is made out of the inability to eke out resources or out of his shortfall in resources to carry out a well laid planned life. And since he couldn’t think out another plan to act upon or otherwise, discover a new life- regretfully he submitted to slavery.
This correspond to the inability to solve a confronted problem. Then he is a fool for that -‘Slavery is one type of foolishness breed from fear and strengthen with fear ’

Now here is a simple philosophical view of slavery and foolishness, every sides has been strengthened by adequate effort, all sides viewed in the mirror of this aetiology – channel of reasoning what slavery is to foolishness.



Out from a slavery, that which is not of the body else I would be in chains-
That slavery of the body which on impulse, I have rejected,
But the slavery of which i speak, subject to the mind I tried to broaden-
I was not slaving to my mind but slaved in my mind.
Many were that slaves to their mind, less
a person will fool them not.
But me slaved in my mind, does not permit me to be fooled,
Even though tried, which was the reason I was made slave in my mind.
I perceive the foolishness in others slaved by the mind.

My slavery in the mind comes out of several possibilities I confronted.
Do I know it is possible yet proving not to be, yet
Do I endure the impossibilities to make it possible-
Thence, foolishness goes bye, in endless effort-



A good many knows to define the man when he is in his act this is what it is suppose to be ‘a dirty dish of shit’ when a fool is in his way.
Often it comes to me like that when I step into a pile of freshly made shit- which is the closes in comparison to when a fool is in his way.
I could admit that I understood the way of a fool’ if you don’t, it’s high time that you know.
Days of walking, working and talking
with different people in different words a fool will often emancipate – do you recognise?
At this end, it is relatively adequate that you should understand that what makes a man a fool is far from the basic undue fact but what makes man a fool is how he sat on his foolishness.
There is apparent difference between these two and when these two occur each do occur in its own ignoble special way.


The society has tried to eliminate the foolishness of man’s heart, if not to eradicate it. It does tried to protect their awareness - like giving out a banana to catch the monkey – so is the monkey that is you.

The society is bread out from necessity – ‘necessity being the mother of invention, but now, that a lot amenities has already been invented, ‘necessity lends to discovery’.

Where the society has done this much we would think there should be not a person that will follow yet after foolishness.

Doctrines with the works of thoughts are often derived at with great believe and a mindset by most leaders where only an idiot is allowed to criticize and reject it. Doesn’t that sound more like the pages of the scripture? It says, ‘A wise man follow instruction but a fool reject every instruction’.


When I think of it finding a fool with a head and one that walks like a man, he rules a city, though foolishness is in man, the least of all is when the serpent is in rule, the man is not a man, then the sum up of it all is that ‘a fool is less than a man’
As an ardent believer of the scripture, the story of the Serpent’s deceitful act is still held in great good heart, thus, as the doctrine goes in the bible. It has laid down, any man whom is not capable of confronting and overcoming the Serpent in you at his act is lesser than man and live under the leadership of the animal.

The Serpent has been made symbolic as a master of deceit, yet it isn’t define the act of wisdom because the Serpent stood as a test of man to know wisdom.
Wisdom is with man and makes his dwelling among man,

On the other hand, the subjection of the animal race did little to annul any antagonistic insurgence of the serpent. Animal has been subjected by power under man. In all doctrines, philosophy and believes of the physical reality, man is held in much more great awesome standard than the other lower species of animal. But from time the Serpent is held in a most fearful regard as a deceiver, like the lion as king of the jungle and man too is at skait to confront him. Yet it, the serpent’s still remains an instigator. In other wise then, the animals has got the upper hand if they should be able to claim the body of man.

How long do I have to search before I find what I’m looking for? You too might consider answering that question – although it is rhetorical .
You know – our man, the fool with a head and that rules a city.
You know when you are looking for someone you will need a description, just like the missing person file. It is barn to be filled with pictures from description or photograph of the missing candidate.
Likewise, in this same picture frame, I could search out a fool. It is very intellectual. Many things have of recent age been made more apparent than before and this isn’t the privilege to victimised each individual whom has privileged from the work of the open minded society.

I think it’s worth the try to practise this simple intellectual search at a sit or on a wide horizon search every other day, being vigilant. And probably, that same candidate might come in-handy one day, just like the Eve came in handy for the Serpent to get to Adam. The believe is that Adam was the target, being the one with the ultimate authority in the garden.

Doctrine has taught me that foolishness lies in the heart of man but the rod of correction will send it away – Then I thought to myself, I must have taken a few of that while I was growing up. And, now that I am a man of my own, my quest for survival, my strive to step up the ladder, from nobody to somebody has also been another rod to remove any foolishness from the heart.

This doesn’t in anyway particularly identify a fool however, it is significant to us when we started taking this simple practise. Understanding is required, because what’s locked in the heart is kind of a little bit hard to get rid of so easily. This tells me like it should to you, you shouldn’t worry so much, you will find your man – he is quite different from your frequent dispel of the abusive word ‘Fool’.

However a few could savour the taste of a long sentence to define what a fool is :A fool is somebody that keeps doing the same thing over and over again without any visual prospect. You have to be a fool to keep on doing the same thing and making the same mistake over and over again and again.

Have I ever done anything of that nature before? I kept asking myself, not very apparent, but a blur vision of prospect. Not every time we were aware of the reason we embark on a mission – not every time you think before you do some things and when you must have done it finish, then you will ask yourself; Why did I even do that?

You do things you’re not aware of the outcome, or just out of mind and you stop in the middle and ask yourself what am I doing? In situation of this sort, most people were often saved by knowledge which is in them- those they have gathered over the years.

It would be a shameful thing to find myself buried in the same moody water I was drawing others out of.

‘Meanness is the defence of the fool just as the same as anger in the bosom or heart of a fool’

Does that sound as a riddle? If it does, the simple solution is the basic understanding that, he is often and easily spurn to meaningless anger. He is like a beard live circuit.
Something very close in contact is wickedness, it is a real weapon at hand for the fool. Where in many cases is also leads to his destruction.

The pages of the preacher rang in my mind; ‘Don’t be too wicked and destroy yourself, and also don’t be over righteous and go before your time’. Eccl. 7 :16- 17.



“A fool does not change his clothe” :-

What the heck has clothe got to do with being fool or not? Simple enough, ‘not all clothe are taken to the laundry’
A fraction of decision is the total abstinent from what you think is the right way; obviously, there is great different from not knowing the right way.
These verification in personality could be identified :-
One is the person that knows what is right and does it not.
Another is the one that does not know the right thing to do,
And again, one that knows the right way, but could not do it.
Where another does the right thing but came out wrong;
Similarly there is another that does the right thing but did not succeed.
Then there is one that either the right nor the wrong thing he did neither.

One that is not included is the person that does the right thing and another that does his own thing and succeed in it; obviously, he will be wise for it.
So in this light one is open to changes while the other will continue, while at the best bet all at one point is often liable to changes.

In a simple practical mindset; why should anyone forget or reject to change his clothe.?
Well the first inclination will be that it wasn’t dirty and the second will most probably be that, that is the only thing he’s got available to wear and the third is more like it, which is because he has no money (resources) to buy another. “A borrowed clothe is still a change of clothe but you won’t reject the dirt (Shame) that comes off it”
That is the right sense of it, in this society a fool can still earn money working and anyone who does not earn money or means of earning money in this Society is in good faith pronounced as a fool.

One of the law which is also a philosophy, speaks well on this regard was when it talks of the thief and the mind of the people. ‘People will not crucified a thief when it thief to satiate his hunger but when he his caught he will pay more than he bargain for- more than what he stole’.

Someone thought deep enough to coin the idiom that; ‘Not all clothe are fit for the Laundry’
Both idioms were relatively connected, in words and in understanding, the subject of each being the clothe which is also the epitome of the expression.

There is a close call in meaning of the idiom ‘Not all clothe are fit for the Laundry’ to one of the proverbs of Solomon, ‘A fool will say all that he has in him or all that is in his mouth/mind or heart’.

Prologue (Unedited)

Different doctrines we have heard, been thought and follow as a result of believing in them to be light unto our life. We've set our faith upon such thereof, hence our raising and falling will depend upon the soundness of such a doctrine. The strength and power attached to any such doctrines will be the principle or anchor even the motivation that will direct the course of the soul, which has cast his faith upon such a doctrine. Most religious doctrines from the scripture were focused on bringing us into the fullest of God, that we might be rich in all knowledge of the spirit. Adding knowledge to life, and life to knowledge, giving understanding to open the eyes of the mind, to the mysteries of God, which most are around us today. Doctrines were thought for life to live with such as Faith, Circumcision, Atonement, Forgiveness, Mercy, Thanksgiving, Tithes & Offering, and more.
We teach the things of God, ways of God and act of God as doctrines. The things freely giving unto man from the foundation of the world and the creation of man; these we teach as doctrine that we might come into knowledge of the proper, adequate and essentials of this gifts.
The doctrine pertaining to God are thought from the commandment of God and his Law; Comparing both the new and old scripture precepts and taking heed to warnings, voice and messages herald by the prophets as concerning the doctrines in focus. These we regard as the proper implementation of knowledge to establish the things of old, bringing to understanding the new things of the present world. The prophets were an important party of reckoning in the teaching of the doctrines of God. God is close to the prophets, also the prophets were close to God at heart; it has been written: "Will the LORD do a thing without making it first known to his friends, the prophets". These are the people God will talk to mouth to mouth; face to face as a man speak to his friend. The burden of the word of God are carried by them; the prophets.
If the doctrine of God are taught from and according to the written knowledge, dwelling also on the voice of the spirit which speaks in a voice of understanding, of things of God; things which were of men also by nature. Declaring the things of the old and things that is to be from the beginning. This voiced, clearly heard from the spirit as the formal prophets have heard and herald the messages of the spirit.
To teach doctrine in any other way will be blinding, this depicts a negligence of the vital knowledge of God. Whereby, the words that as been said will come to pass that: "You teach the ways and commandments of Man as doctrines; and the commandments of God you obey not." These were the ways of the teachers of old, during the period of Christ ministry. These receive a rebuke from him; they like it not, neither do they cherish such a bold authority he seized, to reject their hypocrisy, untruthfulness publicly, calling them blind leaders of the blind.
A heard word; sharp piercing sword from the mouth to the heart of the people/ leaders, which tell the secrets of their hearts. Why do you think evil against me in your heart? He had Seen their thoughts. "And he hath made my mouth like a sharp sword; and out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it, he should smite the nations; and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: "And the word of God is fast, sharper than any two edge sword.
Fright, overwhelming shiver and hatred. They tremble at his words with the authority of his doctrines, as the word comes out like the description; a sword, the truth cut through their spirits and the fire burn in their soul; as he knock it in like a hammer to break even the hearts of stones. This causes them to hate him; he troubled them a lot just with the word of his mouth. A red flaming sword coming out of his mouth; at his sight devils and demons tremble; in whose presence they have no hidden place, no secrets, no hidden solace of the heart, the inward witness, but all things were made plain before him. "What did you come to trouble us, when our time is not yet, thou Son of God" the voice of the Demons at his sight.
People of no understanding from their bewilderment said he has a devil and speaks by the head of all demons: whom spoke and the dead hear and lived. They were darkened in their understanding, and they know not the truth neither does the light dwell in them, otherwise, seeing the light they knew it not it was light, seeing truth, they call it devil; who is blind but my people that were called by my name.
This were of the medieval, the past and lost generation, locked out in the outer darkness, chained down in the abandon, destruction, under the water; the generation of vipers and dragons awaiting the judgement of the son of God, whom they hated because he told them the truth; and the light shine in darkness and the darkness could not comprehend it. Until the hour they were giving a chance to approach; "it is your hour now yea powers of darkness."
This is, was the light that was shone into them and they see not neither recognize they that it was light, desiring the comfort, secret world of their darkness than to cling to the revelation, total openness of the light which reveal all things in his path. "Nothing that is hidden that will not be brought into the open"
And if their work were right they will bring it to the light but being born and held bondage in darkness they hated the light.
Now what compare we this generation with, having known the truth and seen the light yet some still desire to abide in darkness, seeing they were compasses about, round their heels with the sins of their fathers and that of their youth. They love not righteousness but judge righteousness, your truth they make foolishness of, so did the proverbs come to pass upon them; the way of the wise is foolishness to them that were being destroy” Forsake the foolish and live, and go yea in the way of understanding. So it is written: the soul that sin shall die. They have been called to depart from their old proverb, which they sing as a song; " The father eat the sour grapes, and the children teeth are set on edges.
Hands without a body; and body without a head, disobedient and rebellious children, knowing they know, yet they come not into understanding, seeing they see, yet they perceive not and their ear have been blocked.
They have been betrothed to the estrange, who wishes and they obey, in their body and their heart they have sold to the devil; the serpent, their youth is spent with the prince of the air; who is the authority over their mind. But wisdom is known by her children.

They sang the commandment in proverb like song of the psalm but were not willing to do it. “I am a jealous God who visit the iniquity of the father upon the Children, from the first generation to the second, third and forth generation, and show mercy unto thousands that loves and keep my commandment.
This they sang as song; the father has eaten the sour grape and the children teeth are set on edges. Let this be known that: it is the soul that sin that shall die. Therefore, seize from your proverb; forsake the foolish and go in the way of understanding.

What should we say? we whom has seen the light, known the truth and abide in it; should we then go out of it and abide henceforth, in darkness, God forbid: We are children of the day, whereby we walk by day, we should not grieve the holy spirit to forfeit the grace which was shed upon us at Calvary; the grace that was purchased with blood. As the high priest took the blood of the sacrifice into the holy of holiness, as a plead for forgiveness for the people. So likewise did Christ, allegorically did purchase grace for the whole world; first, like a true high priest of our profession, choosing among men to offer sacrifices on behalf of man, atoning himself from the blot of the cross, then by the same blood sort out our grace which lead to forgiveness with repentance.
If the grace be forfeited, God is still gracious who shed his grace aboard in abundant, that you may abound in every good work; for where sin abound, grace abound much more. This is the grace of Christ, purchased by his blood for the forgiveness of the sinners. That a sinner may not die in his sin, this is the will of God, acceptable before the father.
I call the cross a blot on Christ, a shame he bears. I couldn't’t see anything to call it, for the wickedness done; he did rebuke the wicked and bye and bye get himself a blot: Even the cross. This proven thus; it was written; Christ the author and finisher of our faith. Who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame and is set down at the right hand of throne of God. Heb.12:2

When he came in righteousness with healing in his wings and says; ‘I come that you might have grace and have it more abundantly: The son of righteousness, rising with healing in his wings. Likewise, him which has receive a cup that he has been destined to drink from, and when the time come he was anguish and weary, so asked: can this cup be remove from mine head without me drinking from it. Not my will, thy will be done.

Therefore, we talked of the will of God as his bidding to obey; we talk of the will of God as his act of mercy. We talk of the will of God as his wishes and his plan for every mankind, his secrets which he has hiding in our hearts.
And this is the will of God:
-That sinner should not die in his sin.
-That blood should be shed to make atonement for a sinner.
-By the sprinkling of blood; sin shall be forgiven
- That man should give thanks
- That he should be glorified
- That the righteous should not go back to do unrighteousness
- That man should obey and not do sacrifice
- And that his will be done.
Christ said thy will be done. Even regardless that he has to drink from the cup that is been offered unto him and he said in prayer thrice before he was taken (arrested).
The cup of that he has to drink from, depict wrath: Anyway, it could not be wine anymore because he has just share out his blood as wine. However, it is still a cup of wine but not of life, it is of death. Because it is sin.
This is the cup offered to him. These same cup that the whole habitants of the world were made to drink from. This is the cup filled with the abomination and filthiness of the world, which was being giving out by that woman known as Babylon; she made the kings of the earth commit fornication: And if the head be bad; how much more the body: like saying the eyes be evil then how evil is the whole body? And this is the wickedness of the world and is being offered to the Lamb of God that the word of Isaiah may come to pass. “Surely he had borne our grieves and carried our sorrows, yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God and afflicted but he was wounded for our transgression he was bruised for our iniquities, the chastisement of our peace was upon him and with his stripes we were healed.” “He made his grave with the wicked and with the rich in his death because he had done no violence, neither was any deceit found in his mouth. Therefore will I divide him a portion with the great and shall divide the spoil with the strong because he has poured out his soul unto death." “And he was numbered with the transgressors and he bare the sin of many and made intercession for the transgressors” Isaiah 53 1-12.

In here there lay no shadow of things to come; there is no allegory but a manifestation. It first talks of things to come; now we talk of his manifestation. This is the justification of the Lord; yeah it pleased the Lord to bruise him for he borne the sins of many, like giving one cheek to the smarter so also was sin unto him. For the transgression of my people was he stricken and this was the transgression of those people, their allegiance with Babylon the harlot. Even nowadays I can see the sin of my people tallying allegorically with that of Israel then. Christ hated their sin but the people, the sheep of his pasture, he sought, the lost sheep of Israel. For this reason he was manifested.

And the Cross fulfilled the words of the prophecy, justifying and attesting to the prophecy to be true. “When thou shall make his soul an offering for sin” of a truth the cross is a cup he can not but drink, this he knows for he has already prophesy, foretold his resurrection from the grave. This is not what he was anguishing about in Gethsemane.

It will sound rather absurd to say that Christ went to the cross with joy; nevertheless he was never far from it; he knows the joy, victory and glory awaiting him, his joy, is the end has come; the final blow. Many will be offended by what was said earlier, that Christ was like the high priest, him being a high priest of our profession; first; he was atoned then atoned the whole world. But his priesthood was after the act of Melchizedek (King of righteousness) because he bore the punishment of wickedness and the sin the cross is a blot; a curse which was washed away with his own blood. This is the will of God.

The book is focused upon the blood, the doctrine relating to the blood: In here, effort has been made to stretch the understanding of the spirit and flesh on the issues relating to the blood; atonement, sacrifice and the work of the cross. This book clings to more than the commandment, establishing more the doctrines of the law; this being the reason that, in foresight of a better, sound understanding, the source of every other doctrine was the Ten Commandments, being that it clings unto the Ten Commandments, did not leave or annul it.

So when I trace back to the doctrine of the blood to the Old Testament; the book of the law (Torah) to establish a sound foundation of the doctrine and also give understanding to the simple. Where the branch comes from is never to be referred, as some will do to their latter shame, these have no understanding, nor have their hearts been indented with wisdom relating to the commandment and the law.

Pre-eminent is that I notch as an advice that therefore the burden of the law is not meant to be carried as we live under grace, yet still under the law; but grace is in abundance which delivers from the flaming sword of the law. It is true that the law came by Moses and grace by Jesus Christ yet none of the two is taken away. In our blindness we foresee the law as been taken away and grace rest in its stead. This is out of understanding; because grace was given because of the law. We were graced from the law, therefore if there is no law there is no sin, then you have no situation, circumstances to apply, to warrant grace. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ is applied while we are in sin; this is the work of the cross. But the grace of God is for the righteous, this I still baffled about; not for long but a short time; if you be righteous then you have no part in sin, this I conclude and wonder what use is grace for a righteous man. But God is wiser, if he pleases him and gives grace to the righteous to confound the wicked, who dare judge him. Like talking about the mind of God to instruct him or counsel him but as he saw nor to instruct nor counsel him he did his pleasure. Or whom among him that is born of a woman was there before the mountains take shape or the ways of the rain in the cloud, how water got to be above the earth to cause rain upon us. It has been raining form the fountain of the earth and still the storehouse of rain has never been found wanting in the heavens.

Now, of the knowledge and understanding of the spirit and flesh: We know and as witnessed to in the scripture by whom was in the presence of the father and he said, “God is a spirit.” And of good understanding is that man is flesh, nevertheless God has giving us of his Spirit and the spirit of his Son; these are one. The spirit of God dwells in us; in flesh, making us (man) a spiritual house: The body is far more than food.

What cause then to wrestle the flesh and spirit? Why is there no harmony? This, of course, is not of man but of the work of alienation from what is spiritual, to divide the house from him that dwells within. For this cause, spiritual understanding is sought more than that of the flesh because of the knowledge that it is receiving from the spirit of God. And further, for the flesh to move and walk in the realm of the Spirit is of greater advantage; for we would have eliminated the lust of the flesh to yield to the spirit, to God.

Blood, in deeper consideration, physical knowledge of it in the body, it abides in the flesh and was born with man. I have never seen a man born without blood in his flesh. If there be, I am yet to know of such. The blood in the body is of a phenomenon, water in the body can still be accounted for, but blood was there from birth. Even of the biological fact of the formation of blood is to be true nevertheless, the occurrence of such still remain a phenomenon in a day old baby.

Blood is physical; the same goes to water, there present within the framework of the body of the flesh is never to belittle.
The scripture teaches the blood not in the more physical perception of its indwelling in the body. But the scripture teaches the blood, extending its scope beyond the obvious observation, both of its color and nature. At the on-set of the doctrine of this book, an illustration of the bible knowledge was made enunciating on the different areas of the bible. First, start with adoration of God in vastness of knowledge. Being the source of knowledge, who compasses all things present to our observation and out of wonder we explore their nature and work. From genesis to revelation, beginning to the end, more references were made to the psalmist; the king David, He was held in much regard for his praises to the sovereign God. And his work, psalms was quote most to explore, divide rightly and expatiate the subject in view.

The relationship between the LORD and his anointed, King David, in a more accurate analytical view, it leave no room to eliminate the law and the commandment. The thought or act of doing so, will be a result of darkened knowledge and understanding of the relationship of King David with God.
At some point an illustration was made of his life, regarding a trespass he did with Bathsheba and the judgement of God as related to this matter. God loves judgement and a good weight he desire. Consequently, talking about the knowledge of God, in conjunction with his relationship, appointment of his servant, this book stretch the understanding thereof that it is the fore-knowledge of God which precede ahead of his works. Example was made of the anointing of David as king over Israel. Saul the King, even our LORD Jesus Christ could be sighted as adequate reference of the foreknowledge of God at his work. This was established through quotation of various verses of the bible to bring to the understanding the predestination of God. Predestination as in coming forth from foreknowledge, then sanctification, justification and glorification. Together they connote a predestination act of God. Which was said to confound a very common sense that; God elect according to his wishes. Although this is not far from the truth but it does deviate from the truth and as most bible scholar will suggest, a little deviation from the truth is not of God’s perfection, the devil infiltrate through this kind of medium.

Writing this book, the doctrine was first shocking, then illuminations come with more understanding. Seeing the powers that surround me, the manifestation of spirits, the spirit, and their presence while writing, the judgement, and justification, not to say the least condemnation. But being justified by the truth, I knowing the mouth and voice of the condemer, their thought towards me, above all seeing that there is a lack of understanding, I settled it within me to fulfilled a long awaiting desire and break the bond that entangle me.
This I know; if our heart condemns us not, then we have confident towards God, but if our heart condemns us, God is greater than our heart. I seeing the faith of the spirit and still filled with anointing which was under which I wrote, lightened with inspiration that bolded me. I sought for boldness with dedication so as to concludes the book. There was lot of wrestling, seeing the spiritual forces at work, those that were witnessing to the word, out of lies to deceive and thus wrestle with my person with a sure affirmation that they know the truth. I was baffled, at times confused that can what is false witness to the truth. It was wrong a total deceitful way of guilt, which leads to condemnation. Their manifestation was to deceive, defiling the truth. This I consider sought out the true wisdom of God and that of the WORD. Doing this I was able to confound the pride of the wicked.
After much observation of the movement of the spirit, this was enough to take me to the limit, the extreme. While the word was still honey to my lip and my delight day and night. Was when the eye of my understanding was opened, when I was able to write in love, milking upon every line of the word.
The knowledge contain in here confound the knowledge of the wise and thus seeing the travailing of the rebellion spirit whom were contending with me each day, they endeavor to wrest me.
I observe their many struggles, they did eat the word like I did, milking with me strenuously but what kept them down was the desire to deceive, the lust to rule over. While this was still on. I rejoice much in this predicament while yet the sorrow and pain did remain but my joy is in the secret of my heart and soul. ‘Anger lay in the belly of a fool’ thanks be to God, though I have reason to be angry, yet I was made glad in grieve. There was a day I heard the prince of the air call the name of Jesus, shockingly, to everyone bewilder, he does not use to until this day, even though it did not last long before he was back to his former state. He did it to set me at array, seeing my weakness, and he being giving boldness. I wept within me, but yet daily I observed daily his much struggle to hold himself up above me. Many time I laughed at there only desire, is being above up in the air, their lust is to rule, which today they exit and tomorrow they were gone, like the wind. ‘He that rule must be righteous’ therefore I asked; can righteousness be obtain through wickedness? What is bad can not be made right. I wonder how long it took him to contend the name he first called to held someone bound. He deceive many to my hearing through manipulated ways; the knowledge of the wicked. Many prince did exist in the air of course but he was a prominent one ‘ we have been made prince and king unto his father even our God. I saw many been led astray by him because they lack knowledge and many chose to do wickedness so as to be bold, to gain more authority; this is lack of understanding. They know not that the wicked are set in slippery paths.
Wickedness was notched in sentences in the first chapter of this book. Eve was cited as the procreator of wickedness: this progresses and was divulge from the exploration into the occurrence of the event in the Garden of Eden. An act of Eve was examined carefully and by the power of the anointing it was discovered to be wickedness. If we were to anticipate the imminent approach she was to take after discovering that she had did wrong. And thus judging from her deeds afterward, it wasn’t wrong to sight wickedness in her. And I who through the spirit while in the spirit had witness to an occurrence relating Eve to wickedness. And this wickedness, in the prophets was connoted to be a woman. She was put in an Ephah and a lead was put on it, and was carried by two angels upon the wind to a hidden place between the heaven and the earth.

It is quite apparent in the book through –out, the scripture was used often. In most explanation at time it was done purely with lines upon lines of the scripture and precepts upon precepts of the statute to bring to the understanding the spiritual understanding of the doctrine at hand. Therefore, through this means eliminating the canal understanding of the word of God and the doctrine at hand. Moreover, due to the presence of the spirit around me, of whom I have talked of some of them but not to disregard the quite listener to every request; the present help in time of trouble. However, those that were more prominent, even to the touching of my skin requested my use and equal division of the word to show sound understanding and prove a good workmanship who equally dividing the word of truth. Above this, this is the way of the spirit; whereby eliminating heresies and feeble that will turn away from the truth of the gospel. Exploring the scripture, has it never been done before confounding the knowledge of the teachers, set at null the student. It belittles the wisdom of the flesh while bringing down an understanding, a mind of the spirit, the ways of the spirit down into the flesh. I draw from the spirit to give to the flesh. Like David said; And man eat angel food’ it was like in the wilderness, and all flesh were scattered about seeking where to hide from the fire of the word. When it descended from the spirit into the flesh, just like mounts Sanai when Isreal flee from the mountain. This was and is the mind of the spirit according to the understanding of the scripture, for it is written; we have the mind of Christ.
From Eden it was drawn out that the creation of man in God own image and likeness, connote another nature of God. And the woman is thus referred to as the womb of a man. Making them become part of the man, it is of the flesh and bone but not of the spirit. The spirit defers; God breathes into the woman the breath of life likewise the man. Nevertheless, it was enunciated that the authority of the man is first established in the spirit. Man being the figure of the Godhead.

Reckon it highly expedience to voice out of the first Adam at the same time the second Adam. Which is which? Was Adam, made of the dust by the creative hand of God, made flesh as become unto every man, is and was the first Adam. With regard made frequently to Christ as the second Adam. Adam is truly the first Adam according to the witness into the Flesh. But Christ speaking said; ‘why do you call me the son of David? If David in the spirit call him Lord. ‘The Lord said to my Lord sit down at my right hand until I make all your enemies your footstool. Who has been from the beginning, how then could he be the second Adam. I reckon this to be an understanding shortsighted of the spiritual understanding. For we speak of the things in the spirit as if they were physical, thereby, calling the things that were non as if they were.
Christ was before Adam, for it was written; in the beginning was the word and the word was with God. The same was with God from the beginning and through him all things were made and without him nothing was made that were made: And the word became flesh and dwell among us; and we behold his glory as of the glory of the only begotten of the father, who was in the bosom of the father. St.John1:1&14.
Therefore, the connotation of Christ as the second Adam is of the understanding of the flesh; of his physical manifestation of God. Indeed, the word of God was manifested in the flesh, made unto a man and this is whom was thus referred to as the second Adam who was made a quicken spirit. Therefore, likewise us, if we talk of the things of the spirit as if they be physical, we will not reckon him to be second Adam as they that called him the son of David. Or what should we say; Are this two not doing the same thing differently, him that swear by God and him that swear by heaven.

Speaking expressly on the temptation of Jesus Christ, of the things that were written and witnessed to in the spirit. Which was of the spirit, to the flesh. Jesus was led into the wilderness, to be tempted by the Devil, he fasted on the mountain Sinai; this is the mountain that the glory of God descended with walls of fire in the wilderness to give the ten commandment. One temptation, I quote to have been ordained from heaven and that is the temptation of Job. Ordination of an occurrence from heaven means the event or perpetrator of that event must have presented himself before God; the accuser of our brethren. Until Christ was manifested in the flesh, the accuser still present himself before God to accuse man before him. Like in the case of Job, but since the manifestation of Christ he was denial the asses into the presence of God, not that only but he was cast down. Jesus speaking on this account said; ’I have seen the devil cast down from heaven like a thunder, behold I have giving you power to trample upon serpent and scorpion and every powers of the enemy.
At the temptation of Job there we heard Satan said: Put forth your hand upon him and see if he won’t curse you to your face. Job 2:5,1:9-12
God knew job righteousness, just like he knew the righteousness of Christ. After that of Job the rest and other temptation was as the result of the rage of the world. So were the sons of God manifested to reveal and destroy the works of the devil.

From the introduction pages onward, the content of the book might produce an interrogative and judgmental compossition of the written knowledge of God. Rather it is a search into the inward part of the word, to learn all the mysteries of the knowledge of God and the word and thus discerning the truth and the spirit. You that read understand, knowing therefore that the understanding of the LORD is infinity; it is deep as his thought, a brutish man will not know it, neither does a fool understand it. In there, at a point I was compel to notch a word as to your attitude toward the content of the book, likewise prayed towards a good understanding, nevertheless, I am able to answer any question that might arises from the book as to the understanding. But of the spiritual powers that might be entangled with the knowledge of this book, many are they that were awaiting for the release and distribution of this book which has been in the spirit for quite a time now; a cause for various provocation and confrontation.
Although I could not boast of all knowledge of the spirits and spiritual bodies. Moreover I have not been able to adequately compile any such knowledge together. Once I have put pen to paper on a few spiritual awareness but seeing that it will not be to your advantage or any benefit to you and of spiritual strength I desist from it. Spiritual handicap is of no use to anybody.

Flesh and blood, a word drawn from the scripture itself. The amalgamation of the two words, in words or in abstract, in any physical entity will produce a living being. Yet distinctively, they were different; flesh and blood means, obviously perceptively, the composition and state of physical manifestation of every living beings that exist upon the earth. In the early part of the scripture, all creation upon the soil; which walk by the path of the sea were called flesh and blood. This is mostly in the Pentateuch. Looking further into the scripture, all focuses were lost on the animals the gospel speaks expressively directly to man. In there men were focused on directly and referred to mainly as flesh and blood. The gospel of the New Testament is the gospel of salvation from the bondage of sin, rule of the darkness, salvation is light to our path to lead us to God-Liberty, our father; where the spirit of the lord is, there is liberty. Salvation was made for man after the fall from Eden and evil fill the face of the earth. The Son of God offered himself up to deliver man from darkness and lead them back to God. Attempt has been made previously to save the earth from the evil that fill it. God was grieved and thus made he a way of salvation through Noah. On this attempt, all living being were held in focus; everything that exist upon the earth, all flesh and blood. The difference variance of all living creature being combinely referred to as flesh and blood dispute not with man being in the focus as flesh and blood. At the manifestation of the Son of God; yielding to the authority that exist thence, wherefore, a new flesh was made which was not of the dust but of the word. A good point of accountability, eliminating animal from focus as flesh and blood. Nevertheless, there is no other connotation to give them otherwise but of what they have been made of; flesh and blood according to the creation from dust. They share not in the divine, spiritual manifestation of the word in flesh, recreating man from their earthly heritage to an eternal heritage. Somewhere, in the scripture it says of man that even though you were god yet you shall die like every flesh. Also differentiating between man and animal speak forth the Poet king Solomon; ‘who knows the spirit of a man which ascend unto God And that of animal which goes to the ground’.

Perceivable, the first outcome, wake of all flesh and blood were from the dust. At creation; as it was written God created all living creature, which walk by the path of the sea from the dust. He called them out of the dust of ground, though by the spoken word, yet from the ground they were made from. If they were not made from the ground; they assuredly will not return to the dust.
Flesh and blood is two distinctively separate entities according to the spiritual deposition. Relatively, the flesh does not have or is not meant to have a spiritual pertinent. It is completely out of the knowledge and act of God, for flesh to be apportion pertinence. That knowledge is not worth taking heed to, and should be enshawn. The flesh is of physical pertinence, it is of the earth, this reason make the son of God to manifest in flesh. The blood on the other hand is a witness, speaking of its spiritual pertinent, which manifested and acknowledge in the body. The blood gives life to the flesh, the blood witness to the flesh. And as to every witness that gives life and witness to the world are from God: so also the blood can be connoted equally to the spirit, to proceed from the presence of God.
All things has been laid down and established in heaven and there movement, not to cause them to be or act on man/flesh, even all flesh require a drastic movement of the heaven and the earth ‘till heaven and earth Pass away’.
The life giving factor of the blood was acknowledge in the flesh but its spiritual pertinence to have proceed from the presence of God is not acknowledge nor witnessed in and by the flesh. But as we gain knowledge of the things of the spirit, likewise, gained we knowledge as established from the beginning and taught by the scripture, the knowledge of the spiritual pertinence of the blood. This thus expanding on life giving factor; the spirit gives life also, to the flesh in a spiritual revelation for them born of the water and the spirit. But of such born of woman; of flesh and the blood, the blood gives life.
Now of the spiritual pertinent of the blood, believed to be compiled mainly and purely of the cleansing of sin. This thus explained in relevance to the sprinkling of the blood upon the altar. The atonement, wrath symbolism of the blood also depicts a spiritual pertinence.
There is an affirmation of a fact, wherefore; I could not be quoted wrong on the equal connotation of the blood and the spirit pertaining to its spiritual pertinence. This affirmative fact can be obtained from the voice of the blood.

The voice of the blood speaks expressly of utterances, speech and words uttered by the blood; this was achieved expatiating relatively in detail to reveal a spiritual essence contain in the blood. How could the blood speak? Who gave utterances to the blood? Very absurd to consume, nevertheless, it is a spiritual truth.
The voice of the blood, much references, elaborated view was giving to state the fact that the utterance of the blood was for vengeance, revenge, moreover, of the rage, wrath of the blood. For precious in his presence is the blood of his anointed. The avenging of the blood was related to the vengeance of the blood in recompense. The blood was characterized with a personality of God; the voice of the blood at the death of a man citing Abel as example, looking at the condition and likewise, envisage the words the blood of Abel will utter to God.
There is a cry in the spirit, there come from the ground the voice of a righteous man, from the ground where it has been shed come forth: A voice; sorrowful, a mourn, and the soul cry for revenge. The ground open up to swallow the blood of a righteous, in due course, while it yet in the ground. it gave a yell and above the voices in the heavens. God hears the voice of a cry from the hallow of the earth, a mourn, it might be, still he hears. Utterances of the blood. Very distinctive is this voice to be heard above all jubilant noises in the spirit.
Similar distinctive voice was heard upon the altar in the atonement. Or reckon the atonement to be the silence of the lamb?
The lamb can be silent: this I mean the animal offered up in sacrifice, but the human do utter speech and as it has been written regarding the atoning power of the blood of Jesus Christ; it was said it speaks better things than that of Abel. Where Abel was crying and reporting his brother, asking for recompense, that of Christ was saying; Father forgive them for they know not what they were doing. Typical of the Lamb of God who came to take away the sin of the world. Conclusively, the voice of the blood, speak out of righteousness; the blood speaks in righteousness: Let the wicked be silent in their grave.


Who was that that asked; why should blood be shed? or why was blood shed?.
Almost everybody should be able to answer this posing question. It poses no more difficulty at giving ones obvious knowledgeable reply on the question of why should blood be shed. A pressing reply to the question, writing on the sole of each individual heart will be that blood was shed for the forgiveness of sin. This is not far from the truth, however, in the beginning, the tool that drives the hand of blood shedding is sin. The presence of sin, even blood shedding is a sin also sanctified blood is shed because there is sin. This speaking of the blood of sacrifice of the atonement which is not done until the sprinkling of the blood.
But of the blood of man, it was shed because that soul has sin. The soul that sin shall die. In the beginning of the act, blood was not shed so as to make atonement but even then, atonement came because of the presence of sin. So when asked why should blood be shed the hidden reply that will adequately fix into the blank spot will be that sin may be eliminated and evil remove from your midst.
However, this wasn’t put rightly this way in the content of the book under the subtitle of ‘why should blood be shed? Not much effort could be made to impart a stunning doctrinal value on this subject. The death of Christ was as a result of sin, moreover, what warrant his crucifixion was an accusation of sin; the sin of blasphemy. Without the accusation of a sin, there will be no ground for his crucifixion. And of the salvation of the world through his death, that was paid with his blood, this also came to be ordained because of the presence of sin.
If there is no sin then there be no need of righteousness or the need to shed blood of any kind. Therefore, atonement is explained thus as the act that took place after the blood is shed. Atonement is not the shedding of the blood or killing of the Ram. But atonement happened, initiated after the shedding of the blood. The sprinkling of the blood is the ordination of atonement.
God prefer a living sacrifice, than a dead sacrifice; the shedding of blood is not pleasing to the LORD, it is an iniquity, but as to eradicate evil from the presence of the LORD the soul that sin are put to death.

Astounding, this was ordained from the beginning, death to be the wages of sin. From the earlier stage the LORD has make it obvious that the soul that sin shall die. When he commanded Adam and Eve, touch not nor eat of the fruit of this tree, for the day you do so, you shall die.Gen.2:16-17.
This being a matter of statement, yet it was an affirmative statement and the will of God that soul that sin should die.
That life has been contaminated, it has spot and can not stand in the presence of God because he can not behold sin, it is no more to be reckon with God as life, there is a blemish.
The controversial that still looms at the heart of most of us is of the physical outcome of the word of God upon Adam and Eve as to death after eating the fruit. I am not in the position to eke out an elaborated reason why they died not. It wasn’t written that they died, however, they were prevented from taking to eat of the fruit of life. In no short form or extensive form did their expulsion from the garden and deprivation from the fruit of life resulted in death of any kind either physical or spiritual.
There eyes that were opened and thus the realization that they were naked was the entrant of knowledge into them. Knowledge is light to the soul, where they see not prior to the eating of the fruit of knowledge of good and evil. They then were able to see and to observe their own nakedness. God saw the knowledge in them; he saw their eyes opened where they were blinded before and God said; Man is become like one of us, knowing good and evil. Gen.3:22.
Bounded with a curse, they were sent out from the garden. Eden was lost, paradise denied, striving and suffering, sorrow and tears, pain and travailing comes about, which was outside Eden eventually they shall die; death reign outside Eden. The life span of man began to decrease since then henceforth, limitation enter into man with the opening of their eyes. Fright enters where there was non before. ‘It will be totally absurd, wrong to say that the serpent was right. Eventually, man died, where there was no traces of death. Therefore, this eventual death of man does not uphold the word that has been spoken before hand that the day you eat you shall die. Wherefore, they died not that day but the eventual death was the outcome of the later declaration of truth upon them by God. Where he said thus; for dust you were and dust you shall return.
This latter word affirms more the end result of man: it talks of the future not the present; this same word enunciated profess the rising of man and the end was equitable proportioned to be as the rising. In no admitable way does the latter word; which speaks of future pre-conception tally with the formal that was meant to be instantaneous, this were two words which lead to the same way.
And from Eden till Jerusalem, the auction of death upon man, is the sin thereof and this tells the reason why blood should be shed.

In the atonement of sin, what precede prior to the commission of the atonement. The sacrificial initiation were steps to empower, sanctify the act as worth of its purpose in atoning the sin of man or otherwise stated the completion of this sacrificial act to the sprinkling of the blood upon the alter is suitable enough in representing the blood of sinners upon the earth.

Symbolically, the atoning power of Christ was said to be initiated and concluded upon the cross of Calvary without the presence of the priest and the alter, his blood was sprinkled upon the ground where it was shed with water which does the cleansing of the soul. The part of this book that warrant its writing, this fuel which empower the inquisition of the spirit into the scripture, to warrant the writing of this book. In a nutshell, it stands unmovable as the heart of the book. The view relating to the blood of Jesus Christ. Intention behind the writing of this book, which the author embrace; pertaining to the ceremonial application and understanding of the church in the course of pleading the blood. This compass an indulgence which does not enrich nor eliminate the shadow of sacrifice that the death of Christ and the gospel of the new testament was established for. It studied a flamboyant display of the believer in short- sighted to disperse out the blood of Christ.
They did not eliminate the shadow of sacrifice that is still associated with the blood, to implement it as tangible spiritual warfare tool. Display through the word but otherwise, they embrace a more real elaborated display in sprinkling the blood. In the old testament days, the sprinkling of the blood was done upon the alter to initiate forgiveness: this is known as the way of
Atonement. But when it is done and sprinkled not on the alter but all around you, even symbolically, using it as ensign upon oneself, in a simple distinct deceivable way that defile the doctrine related to the new testament.

Not on me is an outburst made for deliverance from a curse. At the opening of the eye, in gaining knowledge of the way of the blood. As said not on me is a cry to ward away the curse of the blood. As the priest and the congregation stood and he speaking for the people in the presence of Herod and also in the presence of Pilate he said: let his blood be upon us, our children and children children. That is a generational curse.
They sworn to their hurt on the blood of the innocent deceitfully, to their own hurt and make it worst they bring it upon their house and their generation. Assuredly, this display a lack of knowledge of the high priest. Did he not hear in the prophets Ezekiel which says; ‘it is the soul that sin that shall die’.
But as to making a vow, be not hasty in vowing a vow, or opening your mouth before the LORD for he is in heaven and you are upon the earth. It is better not to vow or sworn deceitfully than not pay it. Not paying is the sin thereof. Therefore, in a fore-sight of the eventuality of the impertation of the blood upon the earth and on a person with the mind of the earlier off-set established doctrines of the blood in the formal days. Sighting the mind upon the vocal, now written messages of the prophets; the teaching of Jesus Christ fell short in collaborating to hold fast this said doctrines but deviate a fraction to lay down a different one . we could not reject this but search for the understanding of it more, either in the content of the scripture or in the spirit to apprehend the spiritual value of his teaching on the blood.
The spiritual value in revelation of the truth of the spirit, the truth of the message in the spirit; knowing Christ, who speaks of the things done in the spirit, which exist in the spirit like they were in the physical: or speaking in plain language for you to understand the best he could come up with is a parable; ‘for you the mystery of the kingdom of God is giving but to them it is not’. Not all can receive the message of the kingdom of God except for those it is meant for.
I must confess this that the whole New Testament looks toward heaven, a window into the spiritual habitation, into heaven; if one is to passionately, embrace the teaching of Christ in the synoptic gospels.
There is a clause in the subject value of the subtitle; Not on me, it did not speak expressly to affirmatively direct the subject to its source: this was left for latter passages of the book before the focus; the heart of the chapter come out which has been taken away from it own content. In the chapter a more wider scope of the scripture was challenged and treated. It is reaching for knowledge- Epistemology.

What the blood stand for: as to the subject matter to be touched, the same attitude was put into this chapter which spread its horizon above the subject treated to bring into understanding more parts of the scripture, shedding light unto the path of the scriptural understanding from the light of the word.
The work of the atonement is treated, stating the focus of the doctrine established by this book.
Heaven is not physically seen, but we can see it through the eye of the spirit by faith: this tell us that heaven is spiritual; all the host of heaven were not seen with our naked eyes: they were all spiritual; this thus evaluate the named writing of the new testament of things done in heaven. The things done in heaven as writing in the new testament were things of the spirit, spiritually discerned ; not acknowledge in the body.
With this view we look forward to the manifestation of this things which has been said to have taken place in the spirit. This we talk of the New testament of the revelation of the thing which do take place in the spirit and has been said to have taken place in the spirit. Moreover, the book of revelation is another spiritual occurrence which is yet to be manifested.

The blood stands for more than the atonement, which seen to be the obvious well absorbed act of the blood. Of all other things either symbolic or visible which the blood stand for. One things explicitly contradict the whole known scriptural doctrine related to the blood, it explore further beyond the old testament doctrine and with such flabbergastedness, declare his act which loom out opposing the laid down doctrines, law on the use of the blood.
In the gospel according to St. John, he witness therein of the word of our LORd Jesus Christ where he teaches and said; verily, verily, I say unto you, except ye eat the flesh of the son of men and drink his blood ye have no life in you’. John6:53.
We could conclude or assume that he speaks here allegorically, also talking of the things of the spirit as they were real, things to be, to come to pass in the latter days. A symbolic metaphorical speech could be drawn out of this. Nevertheless, as the affirmative clause attached to the speech; verily, verily, meaning Truly, Truly.
This connotes the speech to be exact meaning of the utterance. But even though it was an exact meaning, still it contain the body of symbolism, shadow of things to come. Understanding this thus as was put forward; this is the bread which come down from heaven that man may eat thereof and not die.
Now here is the allegorical figures of the speech: the bread of heaven; that come from heaven; why is this speech an allegory, symbolizing a different thing. Wherefore, it was referred to as metaphorical speech, Not that there is no abstract of truth in the sentence; there is, but it has been annul as to be inferior to this present heavenly descent bread: ‘The manna that came from heaven’ and was counted inferior to this present bread; in that they that eat it died. But the bread which I talk of, him that eat it shall live through it. They shall not die but live; even though they die yet shall they live, for I will rise them up on the last day.
Manna is not the allegory, it is the first bread from heaven, physical in appearance and consumable. Although, the bread he talks of is likewise consumable in such amazing way, because he talks of his flesh as bread and his blood as drink.
How amazing could he get that a man should offer up his own flesh to be consumed.
As desperate measure, in total famine period, most will have cherished this bread reluctantly. This I have not witnessed in real life except in movies.
But why should anybody offer his flesh to be eating as meat when there is food available to be eaten; speaking foolishly, as unlearn, spiritually, the word became flesh; this is the bread from heaven. The word lives eternally, and while in the flesh remain……………………………
Still the eating of the word as meat still remain an allegory, but being in the flesh, does it has a tangible visible, capacity of consumption.?
With this in mind, at the Passover, he altogether, offer his blood and flesh out as meat and drink symbolically: as wine and unleavened bread.
In this manner, to connote the blood as wine and the flesh he talk of as unleavened bread is purely making example of his deed. ‘for also it was written that he is our Passover lamb.
But some spiritually oriented mind will look at the flesh in content of the word becoming flesh and the blood being the figure of speech to depict the Holy Spirit. The blood gives life to the flesh likewise the spirit by the Holy Spirit gives life to the flesh.
A general view, observe throughout is that the blood is an allegory of the pure grape of the Vine (wine). This is where the shadow of the bread from heaven and the drinking of the blood exist. Meanwhile, looking in the content of the word and the law, the law cited a different opinion to the drinking of the blood which this precept oppose.
The word said; for my flesh is meat indeed and my blood is drink indeed’. Can not be argue with in any way. For it is not an abstract of truth but a whole truth. Truly, the flesh is meat either of man or of beast and likewise the blood is drink in the same way.
Consequently, he that eat my flesh and drink my blood dwell in me, and I in him. Jhn.6:56.
Don’t challenge the purity of the truth of this speech. Where this can be depicted as, he that dwell in the word and the word dwell in him. Jhn.15:7.
To view this act of the flesh and blood of Jesus in eating and drinking in light of the law. It is obvious that they were against the laid doctrines of the law. The law says; eat not the blood with the flesh, whereby, where it was said except you eat the flesh of the son of man and drink his blood, ye have no life.
This is of the New Testament, and has thus deviate from the law, old testament.
If we were to look at the content of this words in this light, there is great possibility of disregarding the content of this speech which is also a doctrine; a different act.
However, due to the knowledge of the symbolic outlook, whereby, we look at it in light of spiritual discernment, spiritual understanding and symbolic figure of other materials. We were able to keep the value of the teaching that we might not be continuously asking; how can we eat your flesh?
But we gain knowledge of this through the word, not looking at the astonishing of the speech. Therefore, I submit, in light of a fore-seeable revelation that this speech has not gain a total root in the heart and mind of each scripture student scholar. And the spiritual understanding of it therefore still remain not adequate enough to fill our thirsty soul for a deeper revelation.
This part of the bible in the new testament, radiate differently from the other doctrines of the blood. Continuously, calling the attention to what type of understanding might still be hidden in this words. The call of eternal life attached to this words bear a strong cord of empowerment. If my words be in you and I dwell in you, you shall ask whatever you wish and shall be done unto you. this differ from making word become flesh through the spirit.

Great effort has been taken to show good understanding of the doctrine treated in this book. More words, for understanding were added to lighten; illuminate the understanding of the mind on the issue of the blood of Jesus Christ.
So far we have been through the scripture, through precepts and lines through lines.

A man died over two thousand years ago, now his death imparted the whole kindred and nations of the earth.
The path his blood took is what we were dwelling in nowadays and we await for the manifestation of the fullest of the work of the cross.
So Far, no one has identify precisely the hands on the blood till now.
At Pentecost, Peter stood up with the eleven, lifted up his voice and address the men of Judea. He enlighten them upon the event that bring Pentecost about.
And talking he said; ye men of Isreal, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know.
Him being deliver by the determinate counsel and fore-knowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain.
Whom God hath raised up, having loosed the pains of death: because it was not possible that he should be Holden of it.
In Peter’s address, he made aware that Christ was crucified by wicked hands. Although, there is a determined, fore-knowledge of God. This being the cause for the cry in the garden of Gethsemane.

Hands on the blood is derived from the message of the LORD through the prophet Isaiah to the house of Jacob.
And when ye spread forth your hands, I will hide mine eyes from you; ye, when ye make many prayers, I will not hear; your hands are full of blood.
From verses of the psalm, it says of them that will be called to dwell on the mountain of the LORD; in his presence, they that has a clean hand. Likewise, in Ezekiel, the prophets, it says of the land being full of Blood.
Hands full of blood is word relating to the souls the hand has killed; even the land is full of blood, both is an abomination to the LORD.
In the death of Christ the HANDS ON THE BLOOD, which then after create THE PATH OF THE BLOOD, although, there was a fore-knowledge, predestinate, determination of God.
However, the hands on the blood of Christ, after he said, this is your time powers of darkness. We saw those that pursue his death, being the messenger of this called powers. This is translated as their manifestation.
But Christ said, why come for me now, I have been with you all long, teaching in your presence in the temple and synagogue, you never seize me then. Christ fell into the hands of people, whom he grew up among; surely, a prophet has no honor in his own house.
Among his sheep whom he feeds everyday, with the fresh bread from heaven, still at the dark hour, they rejected him.
Hands on the blood conclude that the same people he came for, he was to die for, he offered grace unto, turn on him and crucified him.
In the light of this occurrence, we look at the churches nowadays, being his sheep fold, his pasture and people, his house hold; then we asked the question; Are we not crucifying Christ everyday of our lives ?
The death of Christ came from within the chain of the temple or synagogue, translating to today language will mean the same as the church.
If perchance, there should be a requisition for blood, they have a focus to look, being the center of all spiritual warfare. They being not prayerful fall into temptation. Christ said; pray and watch that you fall not into temptation.

As to all spirit filled believers, those that set their mind more upon the spiritual things than the physical. They set their mind and heart more on heavenly things than the earthly, seeking more after righteousness, faith, salvation and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit; of the saint in light, just like Christ Jesus will appear upon mountain Olivetti with his saint.
Very prominent among them that they should have an experience of the manifestation of the spirit.
In walking in the spirit and communication in the spirit, they would have built up a spiritual stronghold, an empire of revelation, vision and divers manifestation of the spirit, either in the flesh or in the body of their spiritual form.
In the light of my spiritual experience, of day and life in the spirit, relatively, this will show a more experienced spiritual relation and understanding of the spiritual things and the scripture.
Spiritual knowledge differ entirely from the knowledge of the scripture. However, in a case where the indwelling in the word amalgamate with the indwelling in the spirit, either in agreement with the spirit or at war. Nevertheless, there is a good understanding than them of the flesh and more revelation likewise.
Those that is born of the flesh is of the flesh and those that be born of the spirit is of the spirit.
I have a case, whereby, a spirit born, spirit filled individual is being converted into the flesh, who has heard of such things.
The flesh war against the spirit and not the spirit against the flesh, for the law of the spirit connote peace, and the fruit of the spirit is love, peace and joy ……………..
War started first in the flesh before what we know as spiritual warfare can be called into effect.
What first took the form of the flesh in the heavenly; of the celestial bodies, the angelic ministries which rose up to exalt their dominion above that of God; in rebellion to the authority of God; This is the work of the flesh. For in this likewise it was written ; the spirit of rebellion is worst than the spirit of witchcraft.
Wherefore, it has been ordained that let not the witch live; what then is the hope of the rebellion. But the rebellion as it was said, shall dwell in desolate places.
This are signs of the authorities that rule in the flesh, they make their ensignment in the flesh, lusteth after flesh; they are sin and their desire is of the flesh; man.
This being reason they were of the flesh and thus likewise referred to as works of the flesh.
When I speak of spiritual warfare within my border; of friend and acquaintance and relatives being a spiritual company; I spoke of wars and the revelation of the secrets of the hearts of them that be with you.
The lies of the spirit will not go a mile before you know that you have been blatantly lied to. It is quite hard for the spirit to carry on a pretend for long without revealing its true nature. If you have heard of the revelation and manifestation the acts of the spirit; a spiritual based mind will discern the course of his life by the type of the spirit abiding with him. Not life only but of people around him, activities, and involvement with occurrence.

And this signs shall follow them that believe; although signs be of very little degree yet they count to much in discernment of the habiting spirits.
But I reveal to you a new spiritual habitation of the fullest of the will and power of God. The promise that comes with the signs are of a mission but the habitation of the spirit is of the fullest of the spirit.
Great delight will it be to hear the voice of your friends whom were in the spirit with you. this type of things has merely been spoken of as of the act of the heart not of the spiritual manifestation.
There is much danger in this type of spiritual environment, getting involve and remaining in this spiritual environment might spell a great danger. Nevertheless, it could spell a very good benefit when handled properly through divine knowledge of the spiritual authority that takes precedents over this environment; spirit of men.
To make good use of this type of spiritual environment, there has to be the present of good output of knowledge, with boldness to confront any spiritual bodies; however, the divine intervention of God, heavenly bodies will be a good assurance of leading into salvation.
To see the spirit of man descend down into destruction like that of animal or crawling like a serpent. To observe the manipulation of authorities through deceits which resulted from too familiarity with the man in question, where a spiritual bodies seeks or lusted after ruling over you more than anything is a warfare called. This is not spirit but works of the flesh, this is an enemy.
The deeds of the man manifesting in the spirit, therefore designating the ways of the spirit. Where the spirit has no sufficient or lack the knowledge to lift him up above the lust and deeds of the flesh. Otherwise, the faith, boldness,to confront the accusers and condemers which exist within the spiritual walls.
Of the authorities, and powers that exist within the spiritual walls which might be leading this bodies like a shepherd while other deceiving them into condemnation.
So the words of the prophets, herald which says; my people are being destroyed for lack of knowledge. Hosea 4:6.
Truly, it was said that he that is above is above all. But this id done through righteousness, faith, by deeds and not by wickedness or deceitful maneuver.
Even some might get to be above through deceitful and wickedness but their days were numbered. Because true is the word that says; the wicked were set in slippery places; they abide for a little time, soon they were no more, they were carried away like the wind.


Our heavenly father, hallowed be your name;
In sin are I was born and in sin did my mother brought me out,
But Christ has died and by his blood, I have grace and forgiveness,
And as the blood speaks likewise of better things, as the same blood also,
Stand for me against the enemies of my soul, I pray that the blood will speak on my behalf of better things because I know it is still living
And by this same living blood that speaks, I have victory over the enemy that stood against me, and the powers of darknesses. Thank you father, in Jesus name , Amen.