Life and Blood (Unedited)

LIFE AND BLOOD


Many will stand at amiss in the understanding of these words life and blood; their ordinary view can not easily be placed along together as meaning the same. Both were cores to one another; for life to be there has to be the presence of blood; consequently, for the blood to exist there has to be the existence of life. Both have a long story to tell like telling how the yolk gets to be within the whiteness of the egg and the both are held within a shell. Moreover, the formation of life from this source is not a mystery any more than understanding and differentiating between the two.
Far from me to open up a philosophical debate on what and what each has within its understanding, and consequently what they both were. However a more grounding philosophy has previously been established, in it lays a good understanding and knowledge of their wisdom. Very simply said; ‘In the blood is the life of the flesh’,
If I was going to have a philosophical debate I reckon I should have add; life, blood and flesh’.
Although theological concept of this two human entity deters any, further elaborating debate because it has said the totality of their wisdom. Throughout out the entire Eucharist, they will flee from much philosophical debate mainly based upon the knowledge that the root of any philosophy springs from the doctrines of the Eucharist.

In an attempt to establish a sound doctrinal value to the aspect where the two doctrines of the blood cross path. It raises a controversial view and a perturbation of the inward being as to where exactly this new concept is being derived from or otherwise where it is heading. In addition, in the course of this; as to the assimilation and acceptance by faith it leads the practices to one predestination dominion {heavens}.
At this stage, we were persuaded to question the concept of the root doctrine. Because by one single deviation of the new it change the focus of the old when the new might be accepted as being the new focus or the hidden of the old.
These are specifying that within the old covenant there were hidden concepts, which were not revealed and were held as a mystery to the flesh. So likewise when the new is accepted it has to have been accepted as a new revelation, new deeds and understanding to the obscured aspect of the old. In there we believe the new tells the heart of God, if we truly accept it. However, we accepted it has the truth and thus it is the understanding revelation of the old.

The foundation of the religion and faith was laid down from the old testament, being the reason it can not be remove or what should we build upon, if the foundation is removed? Certainly, nothing shall be erected upon any surface without the foundation, it cannot, but all things are built upon it, following the structures laid down by wisdom.
The foundation, the root of this tree that sprang up in the New Testament and which is to bear fruit that is to be harvested. As the foundation of the building was so also were the seeds of faith planted in the Old Testament, which developed into the tree. The New Testament but first taking root, having being tested by fire bears the tempest and the winds…

This doctrine is far from well taught it is far from good understanding of the mystery composed within the content of the word. Those word emphasis the strengths and meaning even to the origin of the blood.
I still inwardly see a minx, an embargo of falsification, and the divination from sound understanding and knowledge. Just like the scripture saying, you simple minded when would you stop your simplicity.
Far away, I put the simplicity conceived widely by most people of churches, throughout the Christendom, of knowledge, of understanding and the practiced religious rites which is being brought into conception of the doctrines pertaining to the blood of Jesus.
About the distance of three to six years ago, there was a wide spread and confession of the power of the blood. Our understanding was channeled to the realization and absorption of the power within the blood of Jesus.
The fragrant of the doctrine was brushed abroad without the analysis, knowledge and understanding and in-depth doctrine contained being taught.
Many testimony of the result of its practice, from believe and works by faith were given. With many books from passages of the Bible on the blood, the way to pray with the blood and be covered with the blood. What this books strongly emphasis was the continual practice, constant everyday use of the blood. You plead the blood on yourself every time and when going to bed especially. As a result, from some testimonies this emphatically preaching on the blood conformed us into this habit, this simple believes in the victorious power of the blood of the lamb. The finished work of Jesus Christ.

The implication of this new derived spiritual knowledge and use of the blood can only denote one thing only, setting emphasis on the passages of the scripture. Rev.3:11.
The prophetic revelation of this book of revelation pinpoint directly or otherwise relevantly to the induction and later induction of the blood of the lamb into the weapons of spiritual warfare.
The seed which brought up the fruit of this understanding is based upon this prophetic revelation focusing upon this passage or prophetic word therein the blood is a final weapon used against the enemy; the dark kingdom.
This was and is the revelation of things that was, that is and that will shortly come to be. As it was said in the books of the revelation. So if in this end times, of this later days, we come into the absorption of utilizing the power instilled in the blood, then we should realize the upcoming things that will soon be manifesting.
Although their religious rites practices needed top be confounded which might be refer back in teaching as far as the early days of the Leviticus: the sprinkling of the blood’ However I never seen non after the act of the Passover which I think bears more relevance to this act revealed in the book of revelation. The prophetic revelation of Rev.3:11; which I will say takes its root from the act of the passover than the sprinkling of the blood done in the Leviticus by the priest.
This should be quite apparent to most with the knowledge of the scripture, that the revelation of the power of the blood by which it was said that they shall overcome by walks in hand with the lamb of the passover and the deliverance gives through this blood. However this might have been in recognition when the various doctrines were given about the use of the blood of the lamb and our faith was cast upon its sure power to deliver and overcome evil.
This is a great testimony although the physical proof is not available but from the mouth that it was told, the testimony could be held validated as a living proof of the work of God done with the blood. However, as the testimony has been told to witness to the power of the blood. from it, it was derived, plain clothed, one avenue that the path of the blood open in the spiritual world and in revelation of the power of God.
The power of God Was in the sense that; first the blood is a witness from God to the world. Secondly, the blood stood as a weapon of wrath. This have been stated in the book earlier, when talking about the works of the blood. And further making efforts to establish the origin of the blood. So far, the spiritual origin of the blood as been laid down, this is as recorded in the scripture.
1John 5:8 : ‘And there are three that bear witness in the earth; the spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.’
And further in this scriptural passage, it went on to say that in verse 9 : ‘if we receive the witness of men, the witness of God is greater: for this is the witness of God which he hath testified of his son.
In addition, because the blood bears witnesses in earth are they the witness of men or the witness of God? However, this three were witnesses of God because they testified of him and of his son as he testified and bear witness of the father that he is a spirit and of himself that he is life and the resurrection.

Above all this grounding scriptural value of this acts which I called the religious rites induced into the blood. I still decline to acknowledge any sound doctrinal value that teaches the blood apart from what was formally ordained at the time of the Leviticus. I do not see any variation and the work of the new covenant. This speaking about the accomplished work of the New Testament.

The New Testament was pronounced as the establishment of a better promises. Where the blood speaks, where the blood is living, where many has believed that the old was done with taken away so as to established the new. Them that follow this type of believe were in much error. I suggest that they observe well the teaches of Jesus Christ properly and where he said, ‘Non of the laws shall be taken away until they were all fulfilled’. In addition, where he said ‘he came to fulfilled the law and the prophecy, not to take them away’.

This doctrine of the blood is far from well understood, far from good observation of knowledge. I perceive still yet the existence of a minx in form of paradox

I still can not shove away this conception of falsification that I perceived in both the doctrine and its understanding, both which brought about what I perceive as a religious rites. In the name of simplicity the doctrine has been simply conceived in this form which we went about today. However, thank God for faith and grace.
‘yea simple minded when will yea gain understanding’ it sounds more from the pages of the proverbs. Which of course it is . And I still wonder how far we can go with this blindness. To apply the wisdom of God to the teaching of doctrines and it understands. I can not comply with the practice that is rampant among believers every- where; this I speak of the self-baptisment with the blood of Christ; the unblemished blood of Christ.
Definitely, as I am against them that plead the blood upon their own head, I am also against them that sanctify their houses, ornament and churches even them that seals their prayer with the blood of Christ.
There is no much amount of sin in this kind of practices, not because it is a sin accounted for by death but it is because it is a religious practice which lack a good understanding of the will and ways of God. So to what account is it if you plead the blood upon yourself or if you do not plead? You do not sin in any way whatsoever, it merely display a lack of knowledge and the understanding of the things of God. In one of the sub-title of this book, ‘Hands on the blood’ I have made efforts to show you a understanding of the scripture on the guilt of the blood. In there, we looked into those that were the propagators of the death of Christ. Although his death is accounted for has a predestined righteous course; It is expedient that he should die that others might live through his death, however it has been said; ‘And the son of man go as it has been written concerning him, but woe to him whom he go by, it would have been better he had not been born’. These words were said before he was handed over unto them that will kill him. In the will of God they might be justified but never in the judgement of righteousness. The spirit works expressively to bring to pass his will. Just like Paul said; those that he knows them he has chosen, predestined, justified and then glorified. Being the reason you see and hear Peter stood up at Pentecost, and declaring to the multitude the will of God in Christ and declaring his death to be by wicked hands rather than the fulfillment of the prophecy.

In the hands on the blood, I set up a line of understanding of the way, the path of the blood; within the circle of the followers of Christ. Those that have been with him, listen to his teachings, and those of his household deliver him to the cross. ‘was I not in the Synagogue with you daily teaching among you and you lay hands not upon me then’. Simply said; they were his house hold, ‘for the zeal of thy house has eaten me up’. And when he drove them out of the synagogue those that buy and sell, saying; ‘my house shall be call a house of prayer unto all men’. Were they, or were they not of his household and when they all shouted; crucify him, crucify him, give us Barabbas[RY1] . They prevailed, got what they wanted as they have been instigated by the high priest and the council. What did I draw out from this; I draw out the simple admission of justice by this people and their guarantee of doing justice and righteousness in crucifying a blasphemer. However they were blind because their leaders were blind, or can they not see their wrong step in releasing Barabbas the thief and crucifying Christ. But that the word which was spoken concerning them might come to pass; ‘blind leaders of the blind’ Hypocrites. How will they escape the damnation of the darkness ?
They were so sure of their knowledge of the law and justification however the high priest I will believe knows the truth but desires to cover the truth by any way possible. Another generation and breed of Herod. He definitely took after and bring to pass the works of Herod, what that one has stated since the birth of Christ he brought it to pass.
By this fulfillment of will of God; bringing to the Cross the Christ, he stand justified, and touching the anointed, I believe he was truly blinded to the greater part of the law.
And to cap this they stood up against the blood of the anointed; ‘Let his blood be upon us and our children’ they said: giving the author of his cross the confident to authorize him for the cross. It is apparent that without that their admission and standing up to the blood they will not have got what they wanted from Pilate. Obviously, he was ready to bolt out from giving him over to them or having anything to do with his death. He doesn’t want the blood upon him, or otherwise, as he has been advised by his wife to wash his hand off from the blood of that righteous man. So what was left to do? You want him dead or crucified, then are you must be ready to bear the blood upon you,? will you take the blood in your hand? If you are willing to do that then you can have what you want.
Very simple, he is free from any guilt, by their own mouth they swear to the blood and to their hurt even their children. ‘the fathers has eaten a sore grape and the teeth of the children were set on edges’. why should that be so ? Was it not written that; the soul that sin is the one that will die.


So what did I see in this act of the blood and its uses? What was it that Paul ministered to the Gentiles about the blood of Christ; the Lord and his death. Has his appointment was as a minister to the gentiles. According to his gospel, Christ was killed in their boarders.
Christ died for the entire people according to the believe of the high Priest and confirmed by the law that one must die for the sin of the people. If he was to die and did died for the sin of the people then they were ready to take his blood upon their head. Likewise you this same principle apply to you in doctrine; if truly Christ died for your sin then you bear his blood upon you. Because that is the blood that you were redeem by. The precious unblemished blood of the lamb.

Saying this is quite simple but making people loose hold of a faith to take up another is an entirely different issue. Even Christ attempted to no avail, saying; ‘you believe in God; believe in me also’. But instead they said he has a devil. And a blasphemer of God.
The scripture says; one Spirit, one faith and one baptism.
The spirit is God, the faith is Christ and the baptism is of the washing away of sin with water.
Now here is the knowledge that constraint me into emphasizing strongly upon the use of the blood of the lamb in our different churches throughout the Christendom. Our various understanding to the work of the Lord when it rested upon an individual and the strength it holds. Above this the mind of the Lord on the blood.
You should consider this word as spoken in the prophetic verses of the psalms. ‘precious in his presence are the blood of his anointed’.
If there blood were held precious in his presence then how reckon you he will act if any should put this precious blood into vain use of faithless religious rites because it is written ‘faith pleases God’. Howbeit, if your faith is cast upon the blood of the dead and not the living God who is blessed forever, then you shall bear the consequence of your lack of knowledge. Even as to the blood of Christ, who is the living proof of the salvation of God. The ultimate salvation of God. Because he knows his name and he delighted in him, therefore, when he called upon him, he saved him (Ps.91vs14-16) and through his knowledge he was able to save many that believe in him, even in his name. This was the salvation of God as it was shown in Christ. The salvation of God has been shown in Christ and him through his knowledge is able to save as many as believe in him. [Jh.3:16, Rm10:9,10,11&13].

This goes in hand with what Simeon [the old man in the temple when Maria came in with the baby Jesus. Lk.2:22-35] ‘Lord now let thy servant depart in peace according to thy word, for mine eyes have seen thy salvation’ and further, this salvation of the Lord was spoken of throughout the prophetic books of Isaiah. Denoting Christ as a branch from Isreal to bring his sons back to him by his knowledge even to the extinct of the gentiles.



After so long a period of absolute confidence in the flesh and the understanding of the flesh in dividing rightly the word of truth. Whereby many false religion has find way to emancipate. Because they have find fault with what was meant to be the real or true religion; or probably because the true religion is not strong enough or otherwise, because they have found a way to manipulate the true religion. And as a basis for their ground of setting up their own after their heart lust. As they saw fit to do.
Theological doctrines might not accept this but the philosophical views of this modern age will definitely not cast this away. This generation precede the generation of the acts of the apostles, the immediate decent of the testimony of Christ: which is the ministry of Christ. Although his ministry never lasted up to a generation however, the testimony is an everlasting testimony. This being part of the everlasting gospel. Basically, if you don’t find fault in what has previously been in existence, there will by no reason need for the emancipation of another. So you withdraw because you disagree with what is at hand.



TESTIMONY:

Then I called the forth of the superior spirits in the government of Satan, whose name is Belia. [Anywhere you see some people gathered or holding a meeting or dance party and later they start fighting, the chairs or benches are used as whips or perhaps they cut each other body with knives or broken bottles, it is Belia, the demonic spirit whose has visited them. That is his own function in the Satanic order, to cause quarrel, be it in the family, among friends or even in a community]. I commanded him, Go forward, work on them and let them start fighting : I said to myself, after all they call themselves revivalist. When they start beating each other with benches, the newspaper will carry it in the headlines the next day that; Revival turns to a free- for –all fight; carry on; I commanded the demon. He took a few quick steps and then stopped. ‘what’s wrong again ? ‘I Enquired. He asked me to come and see and I moved in to look again. This time, it was no longer fire I saw, but Blood. The whole place looked as if it were an abattoir where millions of animals have been freshly slaughtered. It was as if all the people were totally immersed in the flowing river of the blood.
He told me pointedly that is the Blood of the Lamb of God:
But since I didn’t understand him, I asked him again mocking; you mean that God has a sheep and that he killed it and the blood of it is now frightening you ? I too have sheep at home. I will kill it for you later, so that you can drink the blood : He said it is not like that. He said fairmly; ‘That is the Blood of the Lamb of God who taketh away the sins of the world; He added; Nothing in this world or in any department can face that Blood in combat; so he bluntly refused to go and I chased him off also.’’


-By J. P. Timmons – Mysterious Secrets of the Dark Kingdom. ( The Battle for planet Earth).




On similar manner does the blood bear witness to the earth. In the shadow of this revelation and the Son’s witness to the earth agreeing with the father ; The son being the word and the father being the spirit so also the witness of both water, spirit and blood agree. Where all were accounted unto God the father who is in dominate above all being the spirit.
Analytically, touching the testimony of man on the power of God in the blood. An approval could be soughed from a good understanding of the scripture. Noting this testimony as the work of God in the blood and as a weapon of wrath.

From the revelation of John, Rev.16:4-7 :
‘And the third angel poured out his vial upon the rivers and fountains of waters; and they become blood .-
5- “And I heard the angel of the waters say; thou art righteous, O’ Lord, which art, and wast, and shall be because thou hast judged thus.-
6-“for they shed the blood of saint and prophets and thou hast given them blood to drink; for they are worthy.

In verses five I draw out the similarity between this testimony told by the writer of the book; Mysterious Secrets of the Dark kingdom- J.P. Timmons.
His testimony held ground upon this spiritual and biblical verses as being an act of God. However the scriptural ways and understanding of this action should be more accepted than what was said to be the occurrence at the time.
Further upon this ground I established my own etiology of the blood and its purposes.

This is slightly drawn away from the present doctrines held by the churches, in other word the present understanding of the blood as held by the churches or through- out the christendom.
This shouldn’t be intimidating or neither should it cause any controversy because it bears and sought to strenghten the truth of the gospel and to reveal eradicate false religions As it as been ministered and planted into the churches practises.

Thus from both testimony, the one drawn out from the scripture and the one told by J.P. Timmons. One solid factor and also known to be revealed is the power of the blood working the overcoming way. The wrath of God being shed above the wickedness, the overcoming power of the blood; the weapon of our overcoming as said in Revelation 12: 11.

“And they overcome him by the blood of the lamb and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death.’

Both testimony testify to this scripture verses and prophecy as being truth and it is seen in work. Upon this truth, this revelation of the truth the church rest assured of the power of the blood . if you could observe from previous sections I have like lied down a good reason, although psycologically why the blood appeared to posses such amazing strenght. From the “Voice of the Blood’ a phenomenalism which could be fore sighted about a spiritual ordination and act of the blood. When the bible said that the life of the flesh is in the blood, and this blood is shed through wickedness, like seen from the foundation of the world. This blood likewise testified of the work of wickedness done unto him. The cries of Abel from the ground upon wish his blood was shed. Likewise we saw such mighty act done in Christ omn his crucifiction cross, after his blood fell upon the surface of the earth; though with water, yet the blood cries that the gates of hell fell apart, the foundation of the earth was revealled And darkness cover the face of the earth at that time. which makes the people to reconsider their opinion upon whom Christ is. Some finally said; this is definetly a man from God.

Upon this basis of recognation that the blood is a weapon of wrath, I have established so much factual points denoting the events where the blood has been used in this effects. When the Christians pleads the blood, in the spiritual warfare, the effect of the what happens is what was accounted for in the testimony of J.P.Timmons, as recorded in his book. At a stage, he told of the sight that they saw and their acknowledgement of the blood of the lamb.
‘ The whole place looked as if it were an abattior, where millions of animals have been freshly slaughtered, it was as if all the people were totally immersed in the flowing river of the blood. He told me pointedly ‘that is the blood of the lamb of God” .
This is a spiritual revelation, the way of the blood in the spirit. It could be noted similarly of the extract from the testimony to, the revelation of the wrathof God powered through the blood of the lamb and poured out on the sea in revelation 16:16. The whole water turn to blood and the angel of the waters said unto the Lord that he has Judged rightly, And what I find rather displeasing and discomforting is the acknowledgment that he gave them blood to drink and they were worthy of it. What makes them worthy of the drink is recorded in verse 6 of Chapter 16.
In the event of stressing the agument to the extreme and does leads into erroneous perception, we would not try to probe what will be the effect of them drinking the blood of the lamb of God.
But however in good conscience, I will draw out a relevant understanding of the event of the revelation out from the book of the prophet; Isaiah 49:26.
“And they shall be drunken with their own blood as with sweet wine”.

But we would not be able to take in fully the understanding of the passage or the message if it is not taken in from the beginning. Where it says; ‘and I will feed them that oppress thee with their own flesh and they shall be drunken with their own blood as with sweet wine; and all flesh shall know that I the Lord am thy savior and thy redeemer, the mighty one of Jacob’.

The prophecy speaks about them that oppress you while subsequently the revelation said; “for they have shed the blood of saints and prophets’ the semblance of this two bible verses could not be revoked, and each gives a meaning and an understanding to the other. So as a result of this, a factual judgmental statement was their worthiness to drink of the vial of wrath and drink their own blood.


The Vial of Wrath:

In the bible the subtitle was used in revelation 16, John described in sequence an event that took place in the heaven and the effects were felt and seen on the earth. The event created a picture of extreme destruction of the earth and revealing the anger of the Lord.
In total seven Vials of wrath were poured out from heaven upon the earth and each have different result on the earth. However, the second and the third Vial resulted in blood upon reaching the waters that were upon the earth.

Concerning the effect of the outpouring Vial of the wrath poured the wine of wrath of God without mixture falling on the waters and seas and turning into blood is explainable on that account. But of the sixth vial upon the great river Euphrates which makes river dried up. This reveals another mystery, because I wouldn’t have expected the river to dried up but turn into blood and all the living in it died. But the effect, resulting in the river; great river Euphrates was purposefully ordained, but are they not all purposefully? This is placed in consideration in analysing the wrath of God. However, what took place in river Euphrates is of an entirely different result based upon what was in plan.

Many of logical reasoning might be prompt to suggest that all inhabitant of the seas and rivers died which account for the blood. It seems reasonable to think upon it likewise; wrath is evidently displayed and the end result of it is destruction. Where flesh and blood is present, blood will optimistically flow at its destruction (flesh). This were written in various warning in the scripture; Ezekiel 22:2-4 &9:9. Now, thou son of man, wilt thou judge, wilt thou judge the bloody city ? Yea, thou shalt show her all her abominations. Then say thou, thus saith the Lord God; the city sheddeth blood in the midst of it, that her time may come, and maketh idols against herself to defile herself. Thou art become guilty in thy blood that thou hast shed;-.


In the city, they kill themselves and their children, this the Lord hated and said unto his prophets to tell them of their sin. That what they did is sinful and they shall be punished for their sins.
The people kills and sinned against God; Thou shall not kill; that commandment has been wronged. Something of a similar nature is barn to take place again. This talking of what is been revealled in this bible verses; Jeremiah 46 : 10 “for this day is the day of the Lord God of hosts, a day of vengeance, that he may avenge him of his adversaries: and the sword shall devour, and it shall be satiate and made drunk with their blood:-

More to this; Ezekiel 14 : 19 ;- O’ if I send a pestilence into that land, and pour out my fury upon it in blood, to cut off from it man and beast:-

When observed in all ways that the blood appears, a phenomenalism. It does seems; yes, certainly the ways of the blood is a phenomenal revealing in this form; The same blood which is shed that leads into sin, also was shed to reveal the vengeance of the lord. ‘I will pour out my fury upon it in blood’.
And again, this is the same blood that give lives to the flesh. Deuteronomy 12 :23 ;

“for the blood is the life; and thou mayest not eat the life with the flesh”.

And by this blood nature sins were atoned. Leviticus 17:11 “and I have given it to you upon the alter to make atonement for your souls : for it is the blood that makes atonement for the soul”.
Of the same natural nature is this blood of atonement, although not of man-

Yet , in another place the Lord talks of washing away from the blood; washing with water, and make clean. Ezekiel 16:9. The life of the flesh is and was said to be in the blood but on this account the flesh needed to be washed away from the blood so as to make clean . By water the blood is washed away from the flesh and the flesh is clean. But is it possible for the flesh to live without the blood in it ? No that is absolutely not possible; that flesh shall die.

Finally, we testify to this same blood becoming a token of our redemption from the dead work of the flesh.[sin] Ephesians 1:7 “ whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sin, according to the riches of his grace”. Colossians 1:14 “In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins”. And Revelation 5:9.
Redemptive blood is the testimony of Christ and the cross. The joy of the whole world because he died and rise again from the grave. He laid his life down for the salvation of many putting himself in the place of the Lamb and his blood as to that which the Lord God has said he has given upon the alter for sin.

In the revelation of Jesus Christ as given by God to him to give to his servant [Rev.1:1] Many mysteries were revealed showing the phenomenal nature of the blood. However, mostly within the perception of the revelation; the content of this book of mysteries, the blood was mostly shown to display wrath except in few cases.
Exception cases we have looked into earlier and attempted to analyse. From Revelation 12:11 where it was written that “and they overcome him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony. This is talking of the blood of redemption, atonement made for our sins by Christ, and of that which Paul said that it speaks better things than that of Abel. Heb.12 :24.

In revelation, we were chanced to be the promise of the fury of the Lord revealed; where he has said “I will pour out my fury in blood”.

Not of the overcoming blood or thew washing of the garment in blood of the Lamb which is a phenomenalism of the blood. But it is of wrath dispelled out in great blood, Like the moon becoming as blood Revelation 6:12, Hail and fire mingled with blood, Revelation 8:7 , Sea becoming blood, Revelation 8:8, Winepress dispelling blood, Revelation 14:20.

Out of all the phenomenal of the blood, the greatest of all which bears a recognizable sigma upon it is revealed in Revelation 19:13. This is the word of God appearing with a vesture dipped in blood. ‘the sword of the Lord is filled with blood’.
An easy methodical recognation of fury and vengeance which most often many will pray for when confronted with strong foes that treaten their lives.

When looking at the vial of wrath; we does in attempt to strenghten the understanding of what and how the blood came into diver uses and meaning, standing for different courses unto man.
When I tried to states the uses of the blood, I briefly brush over what and how they were used. Being as witnessed to the earth, containing the life of the flesh and a weapon of victorious standing in Christ. [Redemption from sin].

What I have to analysed earlier comes in hand with an outpouring and dispersment of vengeance on oppression. I was opening up the understanding of the mysteries behind one other major practice within the Christendom. I have set my mind upon this teaching of Passover whereby we share in the blood and flesh of Christ. “And did all eat the same spiritual meat; and did all drink the same spiritual drink’ 1Cor. 10:3-4.
Here the bible and apostle Paul’s mind was set more upon spiritual food rather than the breaking of bread and the drinking of blood which he talked about. 1Cor.11:23-28.
The breaking of bread and drinking of wine has got a physical or earthly practice; it is more of what they does upon the earth rather than the heavenly way to be done upon the earth. “thy will be done upon the earth as it is done in heaven” Matt.6.

Upon these, where that has been counted of earthly, we can thus look into some other aspect of eating and drinking which is of a heavenly origin. Although the kingdom of God is not of meat, eating and drinking but it is of peace, righteousness and power. This I often times try to remember that I might not forget myself in the pleasure of eating and drinking; merry making and forget the tragic part of the kingdom. And I must confess that more of this similar situation did the scripture says we are the generation that that worship the Lord in the spirit and take no pleasure in the flesh. For the father desire such a worshiper; them that worship him in spirit and in truth. Worship is of the kingdom so is joy and righteousness.


Where the blood witnessed to the earth, in the flesh as the life of the flesh and upon the alter as the atonement of the sin. As to every true witness from God to the earth, their task remains upon the earth until accomplished. Therefore, where a great witness enter into the heaven and witness to the blood of the Lamb being present before the throne of God in heaven. It has been previously said that the sprinkling of the blood of Christ was done in heaven upon the alter. He taking the blood into the holy of the holy by his own hand, to present it before the throne of God as the atonement and redemption of the sins of the earth. Likewise did we have a witness of the same kind, that is the witness that enter into heaven and witness to the presence of the blood placed before the throne of God. Hebrew 12:17-24.
“But you are come unto mount zion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels.

“And to the general assembly and church of the first born ; which are written in heaven, and to God the judge of all and to the spirit of just men made perfect.

“and to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant and to the blood of sprinkling that speaks better things than that of Abel.

This is of the same witness of the blood of the sprinkling, the atoning blood of Christ. This witness tells of a mystery that the earth has not seen but him has seen it and report to of it.
In the witness of the blood to the earth, along with water and the spirit, and the three do agree, however after the death of Christ, his blood was spilled upon the ground and the water witness in agreement likewise the spirit. The knowledge of the witnesses of God to the earth tells me that they will not return void except they had accomplish what they have been sent to do and prosper in it.
Christ did fulfilled a task and his blood before ascending to the heaven and presenting himself before the throne of God. This I conclude as the full witness of the blood. Where the blood of Abel did not rest after it has been shed on the earth, but cries unto God for revenge. That of Christ instead plead for the forgiveness of the sin of the earth saying; “Father forgive them for they know not what they were doing”. Just like Christ said on the Cross before he gave up and rested on the cross.


Now the spiritual view of a more solid ground which has an heavenly ordinance or simply put, heavenly settled, because it comes from heaven to the earth. It is on the same principle with the Passover and the same practice except the heavenly and earthly difference. This difference I placed to the teaching of Christ on Passover and his teaching as recorded in John 6:54.
Firstly, before this he teaches and said; “labor not for the meat which perishes, but for that meat which endures unto everlasting life. Which the son of man shall give unto you; for him has God the father sealed” . then said he; “I am the bread of life, which he further explain in verse 55 “for my flesh is meat indeed and my blood is drink indeed.
This same word said he at the table on the day of Passover as he break the bread and share the cup. However, that he said it was shed, meaning poured out or sprinkled upon the alter, which is same to which is shed for many for the remission of the sins. Matt.26:26-28 , Heb.12:24.



At one point we look to see an agreement in understanding of both the newly and old established doctrines of the blood. That is referring to the foundation laid down in the old testament. How could this be that there should exist within this precept a diverted knowledge from what has been laid down. It will create disagreement between many scholars as to the truth of either doctrine. Many understanding have been read into it, with many sticking to the understanding of symbolism and depiction of a more grounded knowledge.
After careful in-depth look into the bafflement that confounded the ancient people than when Christ said that unless they eat his flesh and drink his blood they will have no life. Their bafflement was upon the dear conception of an attempt of eating flesh and drinking blood of man. Without them knowing the law or the prophet but it is right to consider that there is a possibility that the righteousness of the law is written within their heart.
But when the prophet teaches of eating and drinking the blood of man, it is done in fury, vengeance and avenging the oppressors. Isaiah 49:26. “them that oppress thee shall be feed on their own flesh and drink their own blood’.

When we placed this precept along with one teaching of Christ that cohence with the passover this word on eating and drinking his blood that you might have life: John 6. It is possible to see light within the content of this teaching. How the blood of Christ speaks better things than that of Abel. The blood of Christ might also be looked at in this way as being the blood of the Lamb, doing nothing but good; that is overcoming evil with good. However, doting on this principle, we loose light and understanding of the blood of the lamb as being the weapon of spiritual warfare. In Revelation this has been spoken of; Rev. 12: 11.
Where light could be drawn from the old testament, of the lamb offered in sacrifice for the atonement of sin. And the lamb offered at Passover for the angel of death to pass over and fell on the lots of the Egyptians whom has not the blood of the lamb on their door-post. Lev.16, Ex.12:1-36.

From this record, the blood of the lamb is used as a weapon of warfare: the Isreal used the blood on their door post as a weapon to call off death from them, and it went and fell upon those that has not that spiritual weapon that stop death, the entity that gives life to the flesh. The blood subsequently wave death away and they also eat the flesh of the Lamb which the blood has been taken from. The lamb of the sacrifice that the blood and life plead for their own lives.

Further on this foundation, the same nature of event and principle of the Passover was and did Jesus teach and laid down his life. He too was made the Passover lamb. From the scripture, you will derived one thing that Christ was made a lots of things in the new testament. He became all in all that he might be seen as the one and only door to the father. The only path to salvation. Christ was founded upon a foundation which has been laid down; just like life was not of anything new but fashioned according to the prophecies; to fulfill the prophecy. Likewise his teachings were based upon the foundation laid down in the old testament. This is saying that the new testament is built upon the old testament which is the foundation of the building which Christ is also the corner stone.

We have it in many teaching and doctrines and in the understanding of the things that has been written and done in the time pass that this foundation; the old testament was built on Christ. And that he was that foundation which has existed before his manifestation.

Blood and wrath have a nature that is non separable. Each are often accorded for the other. Where blood symbolically referred to wrath and wrath will often resulted in the shed and flow of blood. Blood and life have a nature that could not be comparable however, the spiritual precept says: life is in the blood and anything that gives life posses a power. The power of the blood . there is power in the blood; this is the life in it.
The relation of the blood to wrath or the blood to life were of its witness. Of ordination, not works of man or circumstantially. And the witness are earthly.


The wine press is another thing that might be placed along the vial of wrath. The both display and reveal the wrath of God. Rev.14:19-20.
“And the angel thrust in his sickle into the earth, and gathered the vine of the earth, and cast it into the great winepress of the wrath of God.
“And the winepress was trodden without the city, and blood came out of the winepress, even unto the horse bridles, by the space of a thousand and six hundred furlongs.

Blood came out of the winepress depicting wrath, giving up of life and death of flesh. Thew wrath of God was manifested upon this nation, and they all gather and thrown into what has been prepared for their punishment. the gathering of this people is what was said as the angel thrusting his sickle into the earth and gathering the vine of the earth. There is no difference with the outpouring of the vial of wrath of God.



GUILT OF BLOOD:

No one will ever consider such thing as guilt of blood in this days. There isn’t any omen held within it any longer. This is to the blindness of our present days. Long gone are the times you will be frighten to set sight on your blood, even animal blood will put many to fright. Most of course, my brother is one of those I notice of such fright of blood. He loves eating Chicken but when he saw one being killed he pitied the animal and calls me a wicked man. Afterward, he still eat the animal when it has been roasted. Many were there like him, I don’t believe he is the only one like that. Although he was quite very young then. Nowadays this has drastically changed. You could be guilty of murder or manslaughter even attempted murder but non will consider the omen of blood. I could be so superstitious, but there is a doctrine of this blood which perturb me that I seek so much an agreement between one doctrine which at latter knowledge move into different or in-depth scope. I don’t suppose I should refer it as omen as such but being a source of life in the flesh we could relate to such thing as omens.
Murder and manslaughter is shedding of blood that could be accounted as the guilt of blood.
This is what it was from the foundation of the world, before the gods of this age blocked the understanding and the acknowledgment of such things in this present age. But they were left for them that were of deep heart. It doesn’t fit into anything in this world of now, far from reckoning with. Blood has been a cause of the guilt, what was accounted as offending against was the blood and not the person. Just like in Christ, his blood was wronged against, his blood was shed, the blood of a righteous man.

I have said about guilt of blood, but not the referring to it as a doctrine or the teaching of righteousness. So also, I have talked of city of refuge from the scripture, its purpose has been made known in the scripture, that is where the guilt of blood emerge from.
Blood shed is a weighty thing even to the lord. The only punishment available for blood shed is death. By the blood of him that shed blood shall the blood be cleanse. Number.35:33.
Blood needs to be cleansed because it was written that it defile the land. And it is cleansed only by blood.
With the amount of weight that the shedding of blood carries wont it be rather more provoking and defiling for an occasion to arise where one will not be guilty of blood. Even when he shed blood like saying a thief is not guilty of thieving when he did it and was caught.
However, a thief can be guiltless of thieving in the law of man. Prov.6:30, EX.22:2-3.
Even though he was caught in the act, so also in this same understanding of the law, in the light of this knowledge, can a person who has shed blood will not be guilty of blood. Num.35:27-28.

“And the avenger of blood find him without the borders of the city of his refuge and the avenger of blood kill the slayer; he shall not be guilty of blood.

The act of avenging done by the avenger of blood is drawn from the decree of bloodshed. When a bloodshed could not be cleansed by the blood of him that shed. With a stronger witness can any be put to death: for the murder of man which he has committed. This is the witness of two by the mouth of two witness shall the truth be established. One witness shall not testify against any person to cause him to die; even in all laws of man this has been established in practice.

City of refuge work for the benefit of them which shed blood innocently without a fault of his own. Number 35:9-28, Deut.19:1-14 &15:21.

And putting away the guilt of the innocent blood from among you is a goods thing to put into consideration; it is the restoration of a person or a land from the guilt of blood.
The guilt of innocent blood is put away from a land or a person by washing the hand upon a heifer (female lamb) in the valley. Deut.21:1-9.
The animal is killed in sacrifice for the innocent blood: this position has been taking by Christ as it has been known that he filled all in all. That he might be the first and the last of all things. In the teaching of Christ he strongly show himself to be against murder, the shed of blood: even the thought of it he said it is sin. Which is to say thinking of murdering (shedding a man’s blood) is like doing it. Mt.5:21-22.

So saying about teaching the idea that a person should be found non guilty of shedding blood [killing a man] will not be acceptable in Christ judgement. Because almost everyone will think of their action before doing it. As a man thinks in his heart so he is. Because from the proceed both evil and good thoughts. Surely that is the understanding of the teaching thereby many been murderer and still boast themselves of righteousness of good deeds while the slaughter even with their tongues.



































BY
FEMMY MARTIN



Page: 4 [RY1]